Kto wierzy w teorie spiskowe i dlaczego niektórzy ludzie są bardziej podatni na wiarę w nie niż inni? Jakie są konsekwencje tego typu przekonań? Czy jakakolwiek teoria spiskowa okazała się kiedykolwiek być prawdą?
Psychologia teorii spiskowych obala mit, jakoby teorie spiskowe były zjawiskiem nowoczesnym poprzez zbadanie szerokiego kontekstu społecznego, w jakim powstają – od polityki po miejsce pracy. W książce tej autor wyjaśnia dlaczego niektórzy ludzie są bardziej podatni na wiarę w teorie spiskowe niż inni oraz jakie procesy psychologiczne, które możemy rozpoznać i przewidzieć leżą u podstaw powstawania tego typu przekonań.
Poprzez przytoczenie przykładów takich jak zamachy terrorystyczne z 11 września i zmiana klimatu, Psychologia Teorii Spiskowych pokazuje, że, podczas gdy tego typu przekonania nie zawsze są nieuzasadnione i posiadanie ich nie jest cechą patologiczną, mogą również wyrządzać wiele szkód zarówno jednostkom jak i społeczeństwu.
Jan-Willem van Prooijenis - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychologia Społeczna i Organizacyjna
Jan-Willem van Prooijen – profesor nadzwyczajny Psychologii Społecznej i Organizacyjnej na Uniwersytecie Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam i Starszy Badacz w Holenderskim Instytucie Badań nad Przestępczością i Egzekwowaniem Prawa mającym swoją siedzibę w Amsterdamie.
Aarnio, K., Lindeman, M. (2005). Superstition, education and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227–1236.
Andeweg, R. B. (2014). A growing confidence gap in politics? Data versus discourse. W: J.-W. van Prooijen, P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (s. 176–198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bartlett, J., Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories extremism and counter-terrorism. London, UK: Demos.
Blackmore, S., Trościanko, T. (1985). Belief in the paranormal: Probability judgements, illusory control, and the ‘chance baseline shift’. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 459–468.
Blagrove, M., French, C., Jones, G. (2006). Probabilistic reasoning, affirmative bias and belief in precognitive dreams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65–83.
Bressan, P. (2002). The connection between random sequences, everyday coincidences, and belief in the paranormal. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 17–34.
Cowburn, A. (2016, June 21). EU referendum: Poll reveals third of Leave voters believe MI5 conspiring with government to stop Brexit. Independent.
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941–953.
Darwin, H., Neave, N., Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289–1293.
Dieguez, S., Wagner-Egger, P., Gauvrit, N. (2015). Nothing happens by accident, or does it? A low prior for randomness does not explain belief in conspiracy theories. Psychological Science, 26, 1762–1770.
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22, 57–77.
Dovidio, J. F., ten Vergert, M., Steward, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., Esses, V. M., Riek, B. M., Pearson, A. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537–1549.
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? A fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.
Falk, R., Konold, C. (1997). Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review, 104, 301–318.
Galinsky, A. D., Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.
Gervais, W. M., Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496.
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 733–744.
Golec de Zavala, A., Cichocka, A. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 213–229.
Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69–126.
Hogg, M. A., Adelman, J. R., Blagg, R. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 72–83.
Imhoff, R. (2015). Beyond (right-wing) authoritarianism: Conspiracy mentality as an incremental predictor of prejudice. W: M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, W. Soral (Eds.), The Psychology of Conspiracy (s. 122–141). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Imhoff, R., Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalized political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43.
Inglehart, R. (1987). Extremist political position and perceptions of conspiracy: Even paranoids have real enemies. W: C. F. Graumann, S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy (s. 231–244). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Jost, J. J., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Judis, J. B. (2016). The populist explosion: How the great recession transformed American and European politics. New York, NY: Columbia Global Reports.
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., McGregor, I., Nash, K. (2010). Religious conviction as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 37–48.
LeBoeuf, R. A., Norton, M. I. (2012). Consequence-cause matching: Looking to the consequences of events to infer their causes. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 128–141.
Lobato, E., Mendoza, J., Sims, V., Chin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 617–625.
Mashuri, A., Zaduqisti, E. (2013). The role of social identification, intergroup threat, and out-group derogation in explaining belief in conspiracy theory about terrorism in Indonesia. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 3, 35–50.
Mashuri, A., Zaduqisti, E. (2015). The effect of intergroup threat and social identity salience on the belief in conspiracy theories over terrorism in Indonesia: Collective angst as a mediator. International Journal of Psychological Research, 8, 24–35.
McGregor, I. (2006). Offensive defensiveness: Toward an integrative neuroscience of compensatory zeal after mortality salience, personal uncertainty, and other poignant self-threats. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 299–308.
Midlarsky, M. L. (2011). Origins of political extremism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Schaller, M. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1042–1051.
Oliver, J. E., Wood, T. (2014). Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174, 817–818.
Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 257–301.
Pipes, D. (1997). Conspiracy: How the paranoid style flourishes and where it comes from. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Shermer, M. (2011). The believing brain: From ghosts and gods to politics and conspiracies – How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Skinner, B. F. (1948). ‘Superstition’ in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.
Sullivan, D., Landau, M. J., Rothschild, Z. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434–449.
Sunstein, C. R., Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202–227.
Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133, 572–585.
Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fi ctitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463.
Synovate (2009). Geloven Nederlanders in Complottheorieen? Research report Synovate, 13 May 2009.
Thorburn, S., Bogart, L. M. (2005). Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: Barriers to pregnancy prevention among African-Americans of reproductive age. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 474–487.
Uscinski, J. E., Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1041–1046.
Van Harreveld, F., Rutjens, B. T., Schneider, I. K., Nohlen, H. U., Keskinis, K. (2014). In doubt and disorderly: Ambivalence promotes compensatory perceptions of order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1666–1676.
Van Prooijen, J.-W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 50–58.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Acker, M. (2015). The influence of control on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and applied extensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 753–761.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., de Vries, R. E. (2016). Organizational conspiracy beliefs: Implications for leadership styles and employee outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, 479–491.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 292–300.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., van Dijk, E. (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63–73.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Douglas, K., De Inocencio, C. (2018). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 320–335.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Pollet, T. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 570–578.
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 485–497.
Vuolevi, J. H. K., van Lange, P. A. M. (2010). Beyond the information given: The power of a belief in self-interest. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 26–34.
Whitson, J. A., Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science, 322, 115–117.
Wilke, A., Scheibehenne, B., Gaissmaier, W., McCanney, P., Barrett, H. C. (2014). Illusory pattern detection in habitual gamblers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 291–297.
Wiseman, R. (2015). Paranormality: The science of the supernatural. London, UK: Pan Books.
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773.
Wright, T. L., Arbuthnot, J. (1974). Interpersonal trust, political preference, and perceptions of the Watergate affair. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 168–170.
Zonis, M., Joseph, C. M. (1994). Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology, 15, 443–459.
Zgodnie z Komunikatem Prorektora UŁ ds. nauki dotyczącym systemu ScienceON od 15.09.2023 r. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego wprowadza dane o wszystkich publikacjach wydanych przez siebie autorstwa pracowników UŁ.
Publikacja ww. danych jest możliwa po opublikowaniu pracy w wersji ostatecznej i w terminie do 30 dni od opublikowania.
