-
945
-
700
-
697
-
667
-
636
Pliki do pobrania
Psychologia sztuki zapewnia eklektyczny wstęp do niezliczonych metod, dzięki którym psychologia może pomóc w pojmowaniu i docenieniu działalności twórczej. Odkrywając, w jaki sposób postrzegamy wszystko, co nas otacza, od koloru po ruch, prezentowana książka umożliwia przyjrzenie się tworzeniu sztuki jako formie ludzkiego zachowania, które czerpie z historii jako nieustannego źródła inspiracji, konfliktu i dyskusji. Ukazuje też, jak oszustwo, technologia reprodukcji i seksizm wpływają na naszą ocenę sztuki.
Adams R. B., Krrussl R., Navone M. A. i Verwijmeren P. (2017), Is gender in the eye of the beholder? Identifying cultural attitudes with art auction prices, „SSRN Electronic Journal” (grudzień), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3083500
Alva N. (2011), Art and the limits of neuroscience, „The New York Times”, pobrano z http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/art-and-the-limits-of-neuroscience/?_r=0
Appleton J. (1996), The Experience of Landscape, Wiley, New York.
Barrett L. F., Mesquita B., Ochsner K. N. i Gross J. J. (2006), The experience of emotion, „Annual Review of Psychology”, nr 58, s. 373–403, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709
Bellingham D. (2012), Attribution and the market: The case of Frans Hals, [w:] M. Aldrich i J. Hackford-Jones (red.), Art and Authenticity (s. 22–36), Lund Humphries, Farnham.
Biederman I. (1987), Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding, „Psychological Review”, nr 94 (2), s. 115–147.
Boden M. A. (2010), Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Brieber D., Nadal M. i Leder H. (2015), In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art, „Acta Psychologica”, nr 154, s. 36–42, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.actpsy.2014.11.004
Bullot N. J. (2019), A psychohistorical philosophy for the science of the arts, [w:] S. Wuppuluri, D. Wu (red.), On Art and Science (s. 223–245), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27577-8_14
Burghardt G. M. (2014), Play in fishes, frogs and reptiles, „Current Biology”, nr 25 (1), R9–R10, https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12312
Carbon C.-C. (2017), Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions, „i-Perception”, nr 8 (1).
Cavanagh P. (2005), The artist as neuroscientist, „Nature”, nr 434 (7031), s. 301–307, https://doi.org/10.1038/434301a
Chipp H. B. (1968), Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book for Artists and Critics, University of California Press.
Clegg H., Nettle D. i Miell D. (2011), Status and mating success amongst visual artists, „Frontiers in Psychology”, nr 2 (październik), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00310
Cohen L., Gray F., Meyrignac C., Dehaene S. i Degos J. D. (1994), Selective deficit of visual size perception: Two cases of hemimicropsia, „Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry”, nr 57 (1), s. 73–78, https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.L73
Corballis M. C. (2014), Left brain, right brain: Facts and fantasies, „PLoS Biology”, nr 12 (1), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001767
Cunningham M. R., Roberts A. R., Barbee A. P., Druen P. B. i Wu C. H. (1995), „Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, nr 68 (2), s. 261–279, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261
Cutting J. E. (2003), Gustave Caillebotte, French impressionism, and mere exposure, „Psychonomic Bulletin & Review”, nr 10 (2), s. 319–343, pobrano z: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12921411
Dutton D. (2010), Instynkt sztuki, Bloomsbury Press, London.
Elgammal A., Liu B., Elhoseiny M. i Mazzone M. (2017), CAN: Creative adversarial networks, generating „Art” by learning about styles and deviating from style norms, pobrano z: http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07068
Elias M. i Cotte P. (2008), Multispectral camera and radiative transfer equation used to depict Leonardo’s sfumato in Mona Lisa, „Applied Optics”, nr 47 (12), s. 2146–2154, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.47.002146
Ellamil M., Dobson C., Beeman M. i Christoff K. (2012), Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process, „NeuroImage”, nr 59 (2), s. 1783–1794, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008
Faris J. C. (1988), „ART/artifact”: On the museum and anthropology, „Current Anthropology”, nr 29 (5), s. 775–779.
Feist G. J. (1998), A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity, „Personality and Social Psychology Review”, nr 2 (4), s. 290–309, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
Forder L., Bosten J., He X. i Franklin A. (2017), A neural signature of the unique hues, „Scientific Reports”, nr 7 (1), s. 1–8, pobrano z: www.nature.com/articles/srep42364
Galton F. (1882), Conventional representation of the horse in motion, „Nature”, nr 26 (662), s. 228–229, https://doi.org/10.1038/026228a0
Gibson J. J. (1950), The Perception of the Visual World, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Goldin C., Rouse C. (2000), Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of „blind” auditions on female musicians, „American Economic Review”, nr 90 (4), s. 715–741, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.715
Gould S. J. (1991), Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology, „Journal of Social Issues”, nr 47 (3), s. 43–65, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01822.x
Graham D. J., Redies C. (2010), Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception, „Vision Research”, nr 50 (16), s. 1503–1509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.002
Gruner S., Specker E. i Leder H. (2019), Effects of context and genuineness in the experience of art, „Empirical Studies of the Arts”, nr 37 (2), s. 138–152, https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418822896
Hampton J. A. (2012), Thinking intuitively: The rich (and at times illogical) world of concepts, „Current Directions in Psychological Science”, nr 21 (6), s. 398–402, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412457364
Harman O., Dietrich M. R. (red.), (2013), Outsider Scientists: Routes to Innovation in Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hering E. (1964), Outlines of a Theory of the Light Sense, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
Hockney D. (2001), Secret Knowledge: Rediscovering the lost techniques of the Old Masters, Thames & Hudson, London [wydanie polskie: (2006), Wiedza tajemna: Sekrety technik malarskich Dawnych Mistrzów, Universitas, Kraków].
Huang M., Bridge H., Kemp M. J. i Parker A. J. (2011), Human cortical activity evoked by the assignment of authenticity when viewing works of art, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 5 (listopad), s. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00134
Hughes R. (1990), Nothing if Not Critical: Selected Essays on Art and Artists, Harvill Press, London.
Hummel J. E. (2013), Object recognition, [w:] D. Reisburg (red.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology (s. 32–46), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hutton N., Kelly L. (2013), Where lines are drawn, „Science”, nr 341 (wrzesień), s. 1453–1454.
Ishizu T., Zeki S. (2013), The brain’s specialized systems for aesthetic and perceptual judgment, „European Journal of Neuroscience”, nr 37 (9), s. 1413–1420, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12135
Ittelson W. H. (1951), Size as a cue to distance: Static localization, „The American Journal of Psychology”, nr 64 (1), s. 54–67, https://doi.org/10.2307/1418595
Jauk E., Benedek M., Dunst B. i Neubauer A. C. (2013), The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection, „Intelligence”, nr 41 (4), s. 212–221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003
Kaufman S. C., Kozbelt A., Silvia P., Kaufman J. C., Ramesh S. i Feist J. G. (2014), Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement, „Jour¬nal of Creative Behavior”, nr 50 (4), s. 294–307, https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.78
Keltner D., Haidt J. (2003), Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion, „Cognition and Emotion”, nr 17 (2), s. 297–314, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
Kemp M. (1990), The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art from Brunelleschi to Seurat, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Kemp M. (2014), Art in History, Profile Books, London.
Kidd C., Hayden B. Y. (2015), The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity, „Neuron”, nr 88 (3), s. 449–460, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010
Lanthony P. (1995), Les peintres gauchers, „Revue Neurologique”, nr 151 (3), s. 165–170.
Lilienfeld S. O., Lynn S. J., Ruscio J. i Beyerstein B. L. (2010), The top ten myths of popular psychology, „Skeptic Magazine”, nr 15 (3), s. 36–43.
Little S. (2004), -isms: Understanding Art, Bloomsbury, London [wydanie polskie: (2007), Sztuka. Kierunki, mistrzowie, arcydzieła, Publicat].
Locher P. J., Dolese M. (2004), A comparison of the perceived pictorial and aesthetic qualities of original paintings and their postcard images, „Empirical Studies of the Arts”, nr 22 (2), s. 129–142, https://doi.org/10.2190/eqtc-09lf-jrha-xkjt
Locher P. J., Smith J. K. i Smith L. F. (2001), The influence of presentation format and viewer training in the visual arts on the perception of pictorial and aesthetic qualities of paintings, „Perception”, nr 30 (4), s. 449–465, https://doi.org/10.1068/p3008
MacDonald L., Moroviç J. (1995), Assessing the effects of gamut compression in the reproduction of fine art paintings, „Final Program and Proceedings – IS and T/SID Color Imaging Conference”, s. 194–200.
Mackay D. M. (1957), Moving visual images produced by regular stationary patterns, „Nature”, nr 180, s. 849–850, pobrano z: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/181362c0.pdf
MacNeil L., Driscoll A. i Hunt A. N. (2015), What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching, „Innovative Higher Education”, nr 40 (4), s. 291–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
Mandelbrot B. B. (1967), How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension, „Science”, nr 156 (3775), s. 636–638.
Marmor M. F., Ravin J. G. (2009), The Artist’s Eyes: Vision and the History of Art, Abrams, New York.
Marr D., Nishihara H. K. (1978), Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes, „Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B”, nr 200 (1140), s. 269–294, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1978.0020
Mather G. (2014a), Essentials of Sensation and Perception, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315787275
Mather G. (2014b), The Psychology of Visual Art: Eye, Brain and Art, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mather G. (2016), Foundations of Sensation and Perception (3 wyd.), Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672236
Mather G. (2018), Visual image statistics in the history of western art, „Art and Perception”, nr 6 (2–3), s. 97–115, https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-20181092
Mayer A. (2010), The physiological circus: Knowing, representing, and training horses in motion in nineteenth-century France, „Representations”, nr 111 (lato), s. 88–120, pobrano z: https://rep.ucpress.edu/content/111/1/88.short
McMillan K. (2019), Representation of Female Artists in Britain during 2018, pobrane z: www.freelandsfoundation.co.uk/research/representation-of-female-artists-in-britain-2018
Mendez M. F. (2004), Dementia as a window to the neurology of art, „Medical Hypotheses”, nr 63 (1), s. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2004.03.002
Miller G. F. (2001), Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria, „Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts”, nr 2, s. 20–25, pobrano z: www.unm.edu/~gfmiller/new_papers2/miller2001aesthetic.doc
Mollon J. (2006), Monge: The Verriest lecture, Lyon, lipiec 2005, „Visual Neuroscience”, nr 23, s. 297–309.
Montague P. R., Berns G. S. (2002), Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation, „Neuron”, nr 36 (2), s. 265–284, pobrano z: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12383781
Murakami I., Kitaoka A. i Ashida H. (2006), A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display, „Vision Research”, nr 46 (15), s. 2421–2431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.030
Nesse R. M. (1990), Evolutionary explanations of emotions, „Human Nature”, nr 1 (3), s. 261–289.
Nettle D., Clegg H. (2006), Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans, „Proceedings of the Royal Society B”, nr 273 (1586), s. 611–615, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3349
Nilsson D. E., Pelger S. (1994), A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve, „Proceedings of the Royal Society B”, nr 256 (1345), s. 53–58, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0048
Nochlin L. (1971), Why have there been no great women artists?, [w:] A. Jones (red.), (2010), The Feminism and Visual Culture Reader (s. 229–233), Routledge, London.
Paris J. (2017), Is psychoanalysis still relevant to psychiatry?, „Canadian Journal of Psychiatry”, nr 62 (5), s. 308–312, https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717692306
Parraga C. A., Troscianko T. i Tolhurst D. J. (2000), The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images, „Current Biology”, nr 10 (1), s. 35–38, pobrano z: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10660301
Pearce M. T., Zaidel D. W., Vartanian O., Skov M., Leder H., Chatterjee A. i Nadal M. (2016), Neuroaesthetics: The cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience, „Perspectives on Psychological Science”, nr 11 (2), s. 265–279, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274
Pelowski M., Forster M., Tinio P. P. L., Scholl M. i Leder H. (2017), Beyond the lab: An examination of key factors influencing interaction with „Real” and museum-based art, „Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, nr 11 (3), s. 245–264, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000141
Pepperell R. (2017), Imaging human vision: An artistic perspective, „IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging”, s. 261–267.
Pepperell R., Haertel M. (2014), Do artists use linear perspective to depict visual space?, „Perception”, nr 43 (5), s. 395–416.
Perry G. (2014), Playing to the Gallery, Penguin, London.
Pidgeon L. M., Grealy M., Duffy A. H. B., Hay L., McTeague C., Vuletic T., Gilbert S. J. (2016), Functional neuroimaging of visual creativity: A systematic review and meta-analysis, „Brain and Behavior”, nr 6, e00540, https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.540
Pinker S. (1997), How the Mind Works, W.W. Norton, New York [wydanie polskie: (2022), Jak działa umysł, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań].
Pirenne M. H. (1952), The scientific basis of Leonardo da Vinci’s theory of perspective, „The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, nr 3 (10), s. 169–185.
Pridmore R. W. (2006), 14th century example of the four unique hues, „Color Research and Application”, nr 31 (4), s. 364–365, https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20229
Rankin K. P., Liu A. A., Howard S., Slama H., Hou C. E., Shuster K. i Miller B. L. (2007), A case-controlled study of altered visual art production in Alzheimer’s and FTLD, „Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology”, nr 20 (1), s. 48–61, https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0b013e31803141dd
Rogers B. J., Naumenko O. (2016), Perception of straightness and parallelism with minimal distance information, „Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics”, s. 1381–1391, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1083-x
Sayim B., Cavanagh P. (2011), What line drawings reveal about the visual brain, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 5 (październik), s. 118, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00118
Schaedelin F. C., Taborsky M. (2009), Extended phenotypes as signals, „Biological Reviews”, nr 84, s. 293–313, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00075.x
Scott-Phillips T. C., Dickins T. E. i West S. A. (2011), Evolutionary theory and the ultimate-proximate distinction in the human behavioral sciences, „Perspectives on Psychological Science”, nr 6 (1), s. 38–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393528
Seidel A., Prinz J. (2018), Great works: A reciprocal relationship between spatial magnitudes and aesthetic judgment, „Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts”, nr 12 (1), s. 2–10, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000100
Solomon S. G., Lennie P. (2007), The machinery of colour vision, „Nature Reviews Neuroscience”, nr 8 (4), s. 276–286, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2094
Taylor R. P., Micolich A. i Jonas D. (1999), Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings, „Nature”, nr 399 (czerwiec), s. 422, pobrano z: www.mag.keio.ac.jp/~asako/Aethetics/03June1999pollock.doc
Ullman S. (1989), Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition, „Cognition”, nr 32 (3), s. 193–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90036-X
van der Feen F. E., Zickert N., Groothuis T. G. G. i Geuze R. H. (2019), Does hand skill asymmetry relate to creativity, developmental and health issues and aggression as markers of fitness?, „Laterality”, s. 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019.1619750
Vartanian O. i Skov M. (2014), Neural correlates of viewing paintings: Evidence from a quantitative meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, „Brain and Cognition”, nr 87 (1), s. 52–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.004
Vessel E. A., Starr G. G. i Rubin N. (2012), The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 6 (kwiecień), s. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00066
Vishwanath D., Girshick A. R. i Banks M. S. (2005), Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place, „Nature Neuroscience”, nr 8 (10), s. 1401–1410, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1553
Wapner W., Judd T. i Gardner H. (1978), Visual agnosia in an artist, „Cortex”, nr 14 (3), s. 343–364, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80062-8
Westheimer G. (2001), The Fourier theory of vision, „Perception”, nr 30 (5), s. 531–541, https://doi.org/10.1068/p3193
Wynne F. (2006), I was Vermeer: The rise and fall of the twentieth century’s greatest forger, Bloomsbury Press, London [wydanie polskie: (2018), To ja byłem Vermeerem: Narodziny i upadek największego fałszerza XX wieku, Rebis, Poznań].
Zanker J. M., Walker R. (2004), A new look at op art: Towards a simple explanation of illusory motion, „Naturwissenschaften”, nr 91 (kwiecień), s. 149–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0511-2
Zeki S. (1999), Art and the brain, „Journal of Consciousness Studies”, nr 6 (6–7), s. 76–96.
Zeki S. (2013), Clive Bell’s „Significant Form” and the neurobiology of aesthetics, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience”, nr 7 (listopad), s. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00730
Opublikowane: 2 stycznia 2025
Zapraszamy na spotkanie z prof. Wojciechem Woźniakiem – autorem książki „Państwo, które działa. O fińskich politykach publicznych”.
Opublikowane: 16 grudnia 2024
Polecamy nowy tekst blogowy, w którym Kamil Śmiechowski nawiązuje do książki „Społeczny udział w tworzeniu miejskiej polityki klimatycznej. Przykład Łodzi”
Opublikowane: 9 grudnia 2024
Zapraszamy na panel dyskusyjny, poświęcony książkom o twórczości dwóch laureatek Nagrody Literackiej im. Juliana Tuwima – Hanny Krall (2014) i Małgorzaty Szejnert (2019) – “Krall. Tkanie”