-
914
-
763
-
741
-
626
-
600
Pliki do pobrania
Książka jest poświęcona zagadnieniu dopuszczalności ustalania cen odsprzedaży towarów w prawie unijnym i amerykańskim. Przedstawiona prawnoporównawcza analiza właściwych rozwiązań prawa europejskiego i amerykańskiego, przeprowadzona z wykorzystaniem metody funkcjonalno-kontekstowej, ma na celu rozstrzygnięcie, który z badanych systemów prawa skuteczniej chroni konkurencję, a następnie opracowanie propozycji zmian poszczególnych rozwiązań prawnych.
years of the European single market. Together for new growth. Main achievements, Directorate-General for the Internal Market and Services, European Commission, European Union, 2012, s. 7.
ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments, J. Jackobson et al. (eds.), ed. 6, Chicago 2007.
Ahlborn C., Grave C., Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism: An Introduction from a Consumer Welfare Perspective, „Competition Policy International” 2006, vol. 2, No 2, s. 197–217.
Akman P., A Competition Law Assessment of Platform Most-Favored-Customer Clauses, „Journal of Competition Law & Economics” 2016, vol. 12(4), s. 781–833.
Akman P., Consumer Welfare’ and Article 82EC: Practice and Rhetoric, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Working Paper 08-25, dostępne pod adresem: http://competitionpolicy.ac.uk/documents/8158338/8256111/CCP+Working+Papers+08-25.pdf (dostęp: 12.08.2018).
Akman P., Searching for the Long-Lost Soul of Article 82EC, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 2009, vol. 29, No 2, s. 267–303.
Akman P., The Role of ‘Freedom’ in EU Competition Law, „Legal Studies” 2014, vol. 34, No 2, s. 183–213.
Alese F., Unmasking the Masquerade of Vertical Price Fixing, „European Competition Law Review” 2007, vol. 28(9), s. 514–526.
Altman L., Pollack L., The Fair Trade Era under the Miller-Tydings and McGuire Acts: History, [w:] Callmann on Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, ed. 4, Saint Paul 2011.
An Economic Approach to Article 82 raport European Advisory Group on Competition Policy z lipca 2005 r., dostępny pod adresem: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/economist/eagcp_july_21_05.pdf (dostęp: 30.12.2018).
Andriychuk O., Rediscovering the Spirit of Competition: on the Normative Value of the Competitive Process, „European Competition Journal” 2010, vol. 6, No 3, s. 575–610.
Angland J., Resale Price Maintenance in the United States: A Review and Prognosis, „Competition Law International”, February 2008, vol. 4, No 1, s. 27–35.
Areeda P., The „Rule of Reason” in Antitrust Analysis: General Issues, Federal Judicial Center, 1981.
Areeda P., Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, Boston–Toronto–London 1989.
Areeda P., Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, Boston–Toronto–London 1989, supplement.
Areeda P., Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, ed. 2, New York 2004.
Areeda P., Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vol. 7, ed. 3, New York 2006.
Areeda P., Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, vol. 8, ed. 3, New York 2010.
Areeda P., Turner D., Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application, ed. 2, Boston 1986.
Arthur T., The Core of Antitrust and the Slow Death of Dr. Miles, „South Methodist University Law Review”, Spring 2009, vol. 62, s. 437–491.
Asker J., Bar-Isaac H., Exclusionary Minimum Resale Price Maintenance, NYU Working Paper No 2451/31609, September 2012, dostępne pod adresem: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5c80/eea834f5b088b7a70c96ae50b4391817c7a7.pdf (dostęp: 2.01.2017).
Asker J., Bar-Isaac H., Raising Retailers’ Profits: On Vertical Practices and the Exclusion of Rivals, „The American Economic Review”, February 2014, vol. 104, No 2, s. 672–686.
Ayal A., Fairness in Antitrust, Oxford–Portland 2016.
Aziewicz D., Pytanie o zasadność stosowania analizy ekonomicznej wobec minimalnych cen odsprzedaży w polskim prawie konkurencji, „iKAR” 2013, nr 3(2), s. 8–22.
Bailey D., Reinvigorating the Role of Article 101(3) under Regulation 1/2003, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2016, vol. 81, s. 111–144.
Bain J. S., Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries, Cambridge 1956.
Bain J. S., Industrial Organization, ed. 2, New York 1959.
Baker D., Federalism and Futility: Hitting the Potholes on the Illinois Brick Road, „Antitrust”, Fall 2002, vol. 17, s. 14–18.
Baker D., Private and Public Enforcement: Complements, Substitutes and Conflicts – A Global Perspective, [w:] A. Ezrachi (ed.), Research Handbook on International Competition Law, Cheltenham–Northampton 2015.
Baker J., Recent Developments in Economics that Challenge Chicago School Views, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1989, vol. 5, s. 645–655.
Baker J., Taking the Error Out of „Error Cost” Analysis: What’s Wrong With Antitrust’s Right, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2015, vol. 80, No 1, s. 1–38.
Baker J., Vertical Restraints in Times of Change: From White to Schwinn to Where?, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1975, vol. 44, s. 537–549.
Banasiński C., Wierzbowska D., Reforma prawa konkurencji Wspólnoty Europejskiej, „Problemy Zarządzania” 2004, vol. 3, s. 35–47.
Barnes D., Nonefficiency Goals in the Antitrust Law of Mergers, „William and Mary Law Review” 1989, vol. 30, s. 787–866.
Barnes D., Fischer D., Dr. Miles: Will the Supreme Court Find a Cure?, „Antitrust Source”, February 2007, vol. 6, No 3, s. 1–7.
Barr A., Antitrust Federalism in Action – State Challenges to Vertical Price Fixing in the Post-Leegin World, „Antitrust Source”, December 2009, vol. 9, No 2, s. 1–11.
Baudenbacher C., Higgins I., Decentralization of EC Competition Law Enforcement and Arbitration, „Columbia Journal of European Law” 2002, vol. 8, s. 1–18.
Bauer M., Whither Dr. Miles?, „Loyola Consumer Law Review” 2007, vol. 20, s. 1–31.
Behrens P., The Consumer Choice Paradigm in German Ordoliberalism and Its Impact on EU Competition Law, [w:] P. Nihoul, N. Charbit, E. Ramundo (eds.), Choice – A New Standard for Competition Law Analysis?, „Concurrences Review” [New York] 2016, s. 123–152.
Belhaj S., van der Gronden J. W., Some Room for Competition Does not Make a Sickness Fund an Undertaking. Is EC Competition Law Applicable to the Health Care Sector? (Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-453/01 And C-355/01 AOK), „European Competition Law Review” 2004, vol. 25, s. 682–687.
Bellis J.-F., Brief Historical Perspective on EU Competition Policy, [w:] Reviewing Vertical Restraints in Europe. Reform, Key Issues and National Enforcement, J.-F. Bellis, J. M. Beneyto (eds.), Bruylant, Brussels 2012.
Bennett M., Fletcher A., Giovanetti E., Stallibrass D., Resale Price Maintenance: Explaining the Controversy, and Small Steps Towards a More Nuanced Policy, „Fordham International Law Journal”, April 2010, vol. 33, s. 1278–1299.
Bergh R. van der, Modern Industrial Organisation versus Old-Fashioned European Competition Law, „European Competition Law Review” 1996, vol. 17, s. 75–87.
Bishop S., Walker M., The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Application and Measurement, ed. 3, London 2010.
Blair R., Fesmire J., Maximum Price Fixing and the Goals of Antitrust, „Syracuse Law Review” 1986, vol. 37, s. 43–77.
Blair R., Harrison J., Rethinking Antitrust Injury, „Vanderbilt Law Review” 1989, vol. 42, s. 1539–1573.
Blair R., Kaserman D., Antitrust Economics, ed. 1, Oxford 1985.
Blair R., Lang G., Albrecht After Arco: Maximum Resale Price Fixing Moves Toward the Rule of Reason, „Vanderbilt Law Review” 1991, vol. 44, s. 1007–1039.
Blair R., Schafer C., Evolutionary Models of Legal Change and the Albrecht Rule, „Antitrust Bulletin” 1987, vol. 32, s. 989–1006.
Blair R., Sokol D., The Rule of Reason and the Goals of Antitrust: An Economic Approach, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2012, vol. 78, No 2, s. 471–504.
Blair R., Sokol D., Welfare Standards in U.S. and E.U. Antitrust Enforcement, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 81, Issue 5, s. 2497–2541.
Blaug M., Is Competition Such a Good Thing? Static Efficiency versus Dynamic Efficiency, „Review of Industrial Organization” 2001, vol. 19, s. 37–48.
Bloom M., The Great Reformer: Mario Monti’s Legacy in Article 81 and cartel policy, „Competition Policy International”, Spring 2005, vol. 1, No 1, s. 55–78.
Bork R., A Reply to Professors Gould and Yamey, „Yale Law Journal” 1967, vol. 76, s. 731–743.
Bork R., Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act, „Journal of Law & Economics” 1966, vol. 9, s. 7–48.
Bork R., Resale Price Maintenance and Consumer Welfare, „Yale Law Journal” 1968, vol. 77, s. 950–964.
Bork R., The Antitrust Paradox, New York 1978.
Bork R., The Rule of Reason and the Per Se Concept: Price Fixing and Market Division, part 2, „Yale Law Journal” 1966, vol. 75, s. 373–475.
Boskovits K., Modernization and the Role of National Courts: Institutional Choices, Power Relations and Sunstantive Implications, [w:] I. Lianos, I. Kokkoris (eds.), The Reform of EC Competition Law: New Challenges, The Hague 2009, s. 95.
Boudreaux D., DiLorenzo T., Parker S., Antitrust Before the Sherman Act: The Public Choice Perspective, Chicago 1985.
Boudreaux D., Ekelund R., Inframarginal Consumers and the Per Se Legality of Vertical Restraints, „Hofstra Law Review” 1988, vol. 17, Issue 1, s. 137–158.
Bourgeois J., Baumé T., Decentralisation of EC Competition Law Enforcement and General Principles of Community Law, College of Europe, Research Papers in Law 4/2004, dostępne pod adresem: http://aei.pitt.edu/44332/1/researchpaper_4_2004_bourgeois_baume.pdf (dostęp: 12.04.2018).
Böhm F., Das Problem der privaten Macht. Ein Beitrag zur Monopolfrage, „Die Justiz” 1928, vol. 3, s. 324–345, [reprint w:] Reden und Schriften: über die Ordnung einer freien Gesellschaft, einer freien Wirtschaft und über die Wiedergutmachung, Karlsruhe 1960.
Böhm F., Wettbewerb und Monopolkampf, Berlin 1933.
Bowman W., Resale Price Maintenance – A Monopoly Problem, „The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago”, July 1952, vol. 25, No 3, s. 141–155.
Bowman W., The Prerequisites and Effects of Resale Price Maintenance, „University of Chicago Law Review” 1955, vol. 22, s. 825–873.
Brand O., Conceptual Comparisons: Towards a Coherent Methodology of Comparative Legal Studies, „Brooklyn Journal of International Law” 2006–2007, vol. 32, s. 405–466.
Brennan T., RPM as Exclusion: Did the US Supreme Court Stumble upon the Missing Theory of Harm?, „The Antitrust Bulletin” 2008, vol. 53, Issue 4, s. 967–986.
Brockmeyer K., State Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: the Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act, „Washington and Lee Law Review”, Summer 2010, s. 1111–1149.
Bruckmann B., Revisiting Dr. Miles: Reinstating a Modern Rule of Reason for Vertical Minimum Resale Price Agreements, „Antitrust Souce”, February 2007, vol. 6, s. 1–9.
Brunell M., Overruling Dr. Miles: The Supreme Trade Commission in Action, „Antitrust Bulletin” 2007, vol. 52, s. 475–529.
Bu Q., Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) Agreements under AML 2008 – Per Se Illegal Treatment vis-a-vis the Rule of Reason Approach, „International Review of Intellectual Property Law” 2015, vol. 46(5), s. 565–587.
Calkins S., California Dental Association: Not a Quick Look But Not the Full Monty, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1999, vol. 67, s. 495–557.
Calkins S., Summary Judgment, Motions To Dismiss, and Other Examples of Equilibrating Tendencies in the Antitrust System, „Georgetown Law Journal” 1986, vol. 74, s. 1065–1161.
Calkins S., Wrong Turns in Exclusive Dealing Law, [w:] R. Pitofsky (ed.), How the Chicago Overshot the Mark. The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust, Oxford 2009.
Cann W., Section 7 of the Clayton Act and the Pursuit of Economic „Objectivity” Is There Any Role for Social and Political Values in Merger Policy?, „Notre Dame Law Review” 1985, vol. 60, s. 273–317.
Cann W., Vertical Restraints and the „Effciency” Influence-Does Any Room Remain for More Traditional Antitrust Values and More Innovative Antitrust Policies?, „American Business Law Journal” 1987, vol. 24, s. 483–540.
Carrier M., The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect, „Brigham Young University Law Review” 1999, Issue 4, s. 1267–1365.
Carrier M., The Rule of Reason: An Empirical Update for the 21st Century, „George Mason Law Review” 2009, vol. 16, s. 827–837.
Carstensen P., The Competitive Dynamics of Distribution Restraints: the Efficiency Hypothesis Versus the Rent-Seeking, Strategic Alternatives, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2001, vol. 69, s. 569–609.
Casey J., The Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena, „Suffolk University Law Review” 2009, vol. 42, s. 919–938.
Cavanagh E., Vertical Price Restraints After Leegin, „Loyola Consumer Law Review” 2009, vol. 21, s. 1–32.
Cengiz F., Multi-level Governance in Competition Policy: the European Competition Network, „European Law Review” 2010, vol. 35(5), s. 660–677.
Chamberlin E., The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge 1933.
Choi Y. S., The Per Se Rule on Minimum Resale Price Maintenance in Korea – a Time to Change, „International Review of Intellectual Property Law” 2011, vol. 42(5), s. 570– 597.
Clark B., Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007), „Ohio Northern University Law Review” 2008, vol. 34, s. 657–670.
Clark C., Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.: Loosening The Belt On Price Fixing, „Mercer Law Review”, Winter 2008, vol. 59, s. 767–783.
Coate M., Merger Enforcement at the Reagan/Bush FTC, [w:] M. Coate, A. Kleit, The Economics of the Antitrust Process, Boston 1996.
Comanor W., The Two Economics of Vertical Restraints, „Southwestern University Law Review” 1992, vol. 21, s. 1265–1283.
Comanor W., Vertical Price-Fixing, Vertical Market Restrictions, and the New Antitrust Policy, „Harvard Law Review”, March 1985, vol. 98, s. 983–1002.
Comanor W., Kirkwood J., Resale Price Maintenance and Antitrust Policy, „Contemporary Economic Policy”, March 1985, vol. 3, s. 9–16.
Coumes J.-M., Wilson K., New Rules on Supply and Distribution Agreements: Main Changes of the New System, „European Competition Law Review” 2010, vol. 31(11), s. 439–441.
Craig P., Burca G. de, EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials, ed. 6, Oxford 2015.
Crane D., Market Power Without Market Definition, „Notre Dame Law Review” 2014, vol. 90, No 1, s. 31–79.
Crane D., Klovers K., Speegle A., Private Antitrust Enforcement: Comparative and Policy Considerations, [w:] J. Duns, A. Duke, B. Sweeney, Comparative Competition Law, Cheltenham–Northampton 2015.
Csatlós E., The European Competition Network in the European Administrative System: Theoretical Concerns, „Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies” 2018, vol. 11(17), s. 53–74.
Dannemann G., Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences, [w:] M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford 2006.
Daujotas R., Leegin Case: Resale Price Maintenance vs. Consumer Welfare. Law Comments by Rimantas Daujotas (April 2011), dostępny pod adresem: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1866191 (dostęp: 2.04.2016).
Davis J., Cramer E., A Questionable New Standard for Class Certification in Antitrust Cases, „Antitrust”, Fall 2011, vol. 26, s. 31–36.
Davis R., Capping The Resale Price: What Can We Do With Khan?, „Antitrust”, Spring 1998, vol. 12, s. 33–39.
Demsetz H., Toward a Theory of Property Rights, „The American Economic Review”, May 1967, vol. 57, No 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Seventy-ninth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, s. 347–359.
Deneckere R., Marvel H., Peck J., Demand Uncertainty and Price Maintenance: Markdowns as Destructive Competition, „American Economic Review”, September 1997, vol. 87, No 4, s. 619–641.
Deneckere R., Marvel H., Peck J., Demand Uncertainty, Inventories, and Resale Price Maintenance, „Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1996, vol. 111, s. 885–913.
Denger M., Lipton J., The Rule of Reason and „Leegin Policies”: the Supreme Court’s Guidance, „Antitrust”, Fall 2007, vol. 22, s. 45–49.
Dethmers F., Posthuma de Boer P., Ten Years on: Vertical Agreements under Article 81, „European Competition Law Review” 2009, vol. 30(9), s. 424–439.
Detwiler W., Redefining Interstate Commerce Jurisdiction Under the Sherman Act: Summit Health, Ltd v. Pinhas, „Villanova Law Review” 1992, vol. 37, s. 373–408.
Dewey D., The Common-Law Background of Antitrust Policy, „Virginia Law Review”, October 1955, vol. 41, No 6, s. 759–786.
Diab T., Resale Price Maintenance: Per Se Legality Revisited Per Se Legality As the Next Step in Vertical Price Restraint Jurisprudence, „Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy”, Summer 2009, vol. 7, s. 597–625.
DiLorenzo T., The Origins of Antitrust: an Interest-group Perspective, „International Law and Economics” 1985, vol. 5, Issue 2, s. 73–90.
Director A., Levi E., Law and the Future: Trade Regulation, „Northwest University Law Review” 1956, vol. 51, s. 281–296.
Doorn F. van, Resale Price Maintenance in EC Competition Law: The Need for a Standardised Approach, „SSRN Electronic Journal”, November 6, 2009.
Doty A., Leegin v. PSKS: New Standard, New Challenges, „Berkeley Technology Law Journal” 2008, vol. 23, s. 656–684.
Duke A., Public enforcement, [w:] J. Duns, A. Duke, B. Sweeney (eds.), Comparative Competition Law, Cheltenham–Northampton 2015, s. 271.
Easterbrook F., Maximum Price Fixing, „University of Chicago Law Review” 1981, vol. 48, s. 886–910.
Easterbrook F., Vertical Arrangements and the Rule of Reason, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1984, vol. 53, s. 135–173.
Ehlermann C.-D., Atanasiu I., The Modernisation of EC Antitrust Law: Consequences for the Future Role and Function of the EC Courts, „European Competition Law Review” 2002, vol. 23(2), s. 72–80.
Eibl S., Schultze J.-M., From Freiburg to Brussels and Back Again? The Seventh Revision of Germany’s Competition Law, „European Competition Law Review” 2005, vol. 26, Issue 9, s. 526–531.
Eisenhardt K., Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, „The Academy of Management Review”, January 1989, vol. 14, No 1, s. 57–74.
Elhauge E., Geradin D., Global Competition Law and Economics, Oxford & Portland, OR 2011.
Ellis P., Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS and Vertical Restraints, „North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation”, Winter 2009, vol. 34, s. 569– 600.
Elzinga K., Mills D., The Economics of Resale Price Maintenance, „Issues in Competition Law and Policy” [ABA Section of Antitrust Law] 2008, s. 1841–1851.
Enhancing Federal/State Cooperation, Remarks As Prepared for the National Association of Attorneys General Columbia Law School State Attorneys General Program 7–14 (Oct. 7, 2009), dostępne pod adresem https://www.justice.gov/atr/speech/antitrust-federalism-enhancing-federalstate-cooperation (dostęp: 15.03.2017).
Eucken W., Die Wettbewerbsordnung und Ihre Verwirklichung, „ORDO: Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft” 1949, vol. 2, s. 1–99.
Eucken W., Grundsätze Der Wirtschaftspolitik, Tübingen 1952.
Eucken W., Staatliche Strukturwandlungen und die Krise des Kapitalismus, „Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv” 1932, Bd. 36, s. 297–321.
Eucken W., The Foundations of Economics – History and Theory in the Analysis of Economic Reality, Berlin–New York 1992.
Eucken W., What Kind of Economic and Social System?, [w:] A. Peacock, H. Willgerodt (eds.), Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution, London 1989.
Faull J., Kjølbje L., Leupold H., Nikpay A., Article 101, [w:] J. Faull, A. Nikpay (eds.), The EU Law of Competition, ed. 3, Oxford 2014.
Feldman G., The Misuse of the Less Restrictive Alternative Inquiry in Rule of Reason Analysis, „American University Law Review” 2009, vol. 58, s. 561–632.
Fiala M., Westrich S., Leegin Creative Leather Products: What Does the New Rule of Reason Standard Mean for Resale Price Maintenance Claims?, „Antitrust Source”, August 2007, vol. 6, No 6, s. 1–10.
Fidala J., Narzucanie minimalnych i sztywnych cen odsprzedaży z punktu widzenia celu oraz skutków rynkowych, „iKAR” 2012, nr 3(1), s. 26–42.
Fikentscher W., Methoden des Rechts in vergleichender Darstellung, vol. I, Tübingen 1975.
First H., Waller S., Antitrust’s Democracy Deficit, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 81, s. 2543–2574.
Fletcher A., Hviid M., Broad Retail Price MFN Clauses: Are They RPM „At Its Worst”?, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2016, vol. 81, s. 65–98.
Fox E., Monopolization and Dominance in the United States and the European Community: Efficiency, Opportunity, and Fairness, „Notre Dame Law Review” 1986, vol. 61, s. 981–1020.
Fox E., The Efficiency Paradox, [w:] R. Pitofsky (ed.), How the Chicago Overshot the Mark. The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
Fox E., The Modernization of Antitrust: A New Equilibrium, „Cornell Law Review”, August 1981, vol. 66, Issue 6, s. 1140–1192.
Fox. E., Sullivan L., Cases and Materials on Antitrust, Saint Paul 1989.
Frenz W., Handbook of EU Competition Law, Berlin–Heidelberg 2016.
Fulda C., Resale Price Maintenance, „The University of Chicago Law Review” 1954, vol. 21, No 2, s. 175–211.
Gavil A., Kovacic W., Baker J., Antitrust Law in Perspective: Cases, Concepts and Problems in Competition Policy, Saint Paul 2002.
Geradin D., Layne-Farrar A., Petit N., EU Competition Law and Economics, Oxford 2012.
Geradin D., Sadrak K., The EU Competition Law Fining System: A Quantitative Review of the Commission Decisions between 2000 and 2017, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) Law and Economics Research Paper Series No 2017-018.
Gerber D., Comparative Antitrust Law, [w:] M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford 2006.
Gerber D., Competition Law and International Trade: The European Union and the Neo-Liberal Factor, „Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal” 1995, vol. 37, s. 37–57.
Gerber D., Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-Liberalism, Competition Law and the „New” Europe, „American Journal of Comparative Law” 1994, vol. 42, No 1, s. 25–84.
Gerber D., Fairness In Competition Law: European and U.S. Experience, Referat na Konferencję Fairness and Asian Competition Laws w Kyoto, 5 marca 2004, s. 3; dostępne pod adresem: http://archive.kyotogakuen.ac.jp/o_ied/information/fairness_in_competition_law.pdf (dostęp: 12.03.2017).
Gerber D., Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe. Protecting Prometheus, Oxford 1998.
Gerber D., Sculpting the Agenda of Comparative Law: Ernst Rabel and the Facade of Language, [w:] A. Riles (ed.), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law, Oxford–Portland 2001.
Gerber D., The Transformation of European Community Competition Law?, „Harvard International Law Journal” 1994, vol. 35, s. 97–147.
Gerber D., Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law, „Fordham International Law Journal” 2007, vol. 31, Issue 5, s. 1235–1265.
Geyskens I., Gielens K., Dekimpe M., The Market Valuation of Internet Channel Additions, „Journal of Marketing” 2002, vol. 66, s. 102–119.
Gilliams H. M., Modernisation: from Policy to Practice, „European Law Review” 2003, vol. 4, s. 451–474.
Ginsburg D., Originalism and Economic Analysis: Two Case Studies of Consistency and Coherence in Supreme Court Decision Making, „Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy”, Winter 2010, vol. 33, No 1, s. 217–238.
Glendon M. A., Carozza P., Picker C., Comparative Legal Traditions, Saint Paul 2006.
Gould J., Preston L., Resale Price Maintenance and Retail Outlets, „Economica”, New Series, August 1965, vol. 32, No 127, s. 302–312.
Gould J., Yamey B., Professor Bork on Vertical Price Fixing, „Yale Law Journal” 1967, vol. 76, s. 722–730.
Gould J., Yamey B., Professor Bork on Vertical Price Fixing. A Rejoinder, „Yale Law Journal” 1968, vol. 77, s. 936–949.
Graca T. da, Masson R., The „Services” Explanation for Resale Price Maintenance: Deleterious results Missed in the Economics Literature and in Legal Decisions, „Southern Economic Journal” 2012, vol. 79(2), s. 450–463.
Graham C., Methods for Determining Whether an Agreement Restricts Competition: Comment on Allianz Hungaria, „European Law Review” 2013, vol. 38(4), s. 542–551.
Grether E., Experience in California with Fair Trade Legislation Restricting Price-Cutting, „California Law Review”, September 1936, vol. 24, s. 640–700.
Griffiths M., A Glorification of de minimis – the Regulation on Vertical Agreements, „European Competition Law Review” 2000, vol. 21(5), s. 241–247.
Grimes W., A Dynamic Analysis of Resale Price Maintenance: Inefficient Brand Promotion, Higher Margins, Distorted Choices, and Retarded Retailer Innovation, „The Antitrust Bulletin”, Spring 2010, vol. 55, No 1, s. 101–150.
Grimes W., Making Sense of State Oil Co. v. Khan: Vertical Maximum Price Fixing Under a Rule of Reason, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1998, vol. 66, s. 567–611.
Grimes W., Spiff, Polish, and Consumer Demand Quality: Vertical Price Restraints Revisited, „California Law Review”, July 1992, vol. 80, Issue 4, s. 815–855.
Grimes W., The Path Forward After Leegin: Seeking Consensus Reform of the Antitrust Law of Vertical Restraints, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2008, vol. 75, No 2, s. 467–504.
Grimes W., The Seven Myths of Vertical Price Fixing: the Politics and Economics of a Century-Long Debate, „Southwestern University Law Review” 1992, vol. 21, s. 1285–1316.
Grosswald Curran V., Cultural Immersion, Difference and Categories in U.S. Comparative Law, „American Journal of Comparative Law” 1998, vol. 46, s. 43–92.
Grzejdziak Ł., Glosa do wyroku TSUE w sprawie SELEX Sistemi Integrati S.p.A. przeciwko Komisji Wspólnot Europejskich oraz Eurocontrol, [w:] A. Jurkowska-Gomułka (red.), Orzecznictwo sądów wspólnotowych w sprawach konkurencji w latach 2004–2009, Warszawa 2010.
Grzejdziak Ł., Komentarz do rozporządzenia z 30 marca 2011 r. z w sprawie wyłączenia niektórych rodzajów porozumień wertykalnych spod zakazu porozumień ograniczających konkurencję, [w:] T. Skoczny (red.), Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów, wyd. 2, Warszawa 2014.
Grzejdziak Ł., Po owocach ich poznacie? Kilka refleksji na temat paradoksów amerykańskiego prawa antytrustowego na przykładzie sprawy Stany Zjednoczone v. Apple, [w:] M. Bernatt, A. Jurkowska-Gomułka, M. Namysłowska, A. Piszcz (red.), Wyzwania dla ochrony konkurencji i regulacji rynku. Księga Jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Tadeuszowi Skocznemu, Warszawa 2017, s. 77–93.
Grzejdziak Ł., Zakaz ustalania cen odsprzedaży towarów. Warunek sine qua non efektywnej konkurencji czy nieproporcjonalne ograniczenie wolności gospodarczej, [w:] W. Szwajdler, H. Nowicki (red.), Konstytucyjna zasada wolności gospodarczej, Toruń 2009.
Gundlach G., Cannon J., Manning K., Free Riding and Resale Price Maintenance: Insights from Marketing Research and Practice, „The Antitrust Bulletin”, Summer 2010, vol. 55, No 2, s. 381–422.
Gundlach G., Krotz R., Resale Price Maintenance after Leegin: The Curious Case of Contact Lenses, American Antitrust Institute Working Paper No 15-04, dostępny pod adresem: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2712418 (dostęp: 15.04.2017).
Gundlach G., Manning K., Cannon J., Resale Price Maintenance: A Review and Call for Research, American Antitrust Institute Working Paper No 14-03, April 17, 2014; dostępny pod adresem: https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/WorkingPaper14-03.pdf (dostęp: 10.05.2016).
Hancock R. E., Antitrust: Legal Status of Consignment Agreements, „Tulsa Law Review” 1965, vol. 2, Issue 1, s. 55–57.
Handler M., The Twentieth Annual Antitrust Review 1967, „Virginia Law Review” 1967, vol. 53, s. 1667.
Harris N., Leegin’s Effect on Prices: an Empirical Analysis, „Journal of Law, Economics & Policy”, Winter 2013, vol. 9, s. 251–276.
Harrison D., The Allianz Hungária Case – The ECJ’s Judgment Could Have Ugly Consequences, „Competition Law Insight” 2013, vol. 12, Issue 6, s. 10–12.
Haw R., Adversarial Economics in Antitrust Litigation: Losing Academic Consensus in the Battle of the Experts, „Northwestern University Law Review” 2012, vol. 106, s. 1261–1305.
Hawk B. E., Antitrust in the EEC – The First Decade, „Fordham Law Review” 1972, vol. 41, s. 229–292.
Hawk B. E., System Failure: Vertical Restraints and EC Competition Law, „Common Market Law Review” 1995, vol. 32, Issue 4, s. 973–989.
Herman E., A Statistical Note on Fair Trade, „Antitrust Bulletin” 1959, vol. 4, s. 583–592.
Hersch P., The Effects of Resale Price Maintenance on Shareholder Wealth: The Consequences of Schwegmann, „Journal of Industrial Economics” 1994, vol. 42, s. 205–216.
Heyer K., Welfare Standards and Merger Analysis: Why Not the Best?, „Competition Policy International”, Autumn 2006, vol. 2, s. 29–54.
High J., Bork’s Paradox: Static vs. Dynamic Efficiency in Antitrust Analysis, „Contemporary Economic Policy”, July 2007, vol. 3(2), s. 21–34.
Holmes W., Mangiaracina M., Antitrust Law Handbook, Database updated November 2015, West/el.
Horton T., Fairness and Antitrust Reconsidered: An Evolutionary Perspective, „McGeorge Law Review” 2013, vol. 44, No 4, s. 823–864.
Hovenkamp H., Antitrust Policy After Chicago, „Michigan Law Review” 1985, vol. 84, s. 213–284.
Hovenkamp H., Federal Antitrust Policy. The Law of Competition and its Practice, ed. 5, Saint Paul 2016.
Hovenkamp H., The Antitrust Enterprise. Principle and Execution, Cambridge 2005.
Hovenkamp H., Vertical Integration by the Newspaper Monopolist, „Iowa Law Review” 1984, vol. 69, s. 451–467.
Hovenkamp H., Vertical Restrictions and Monopoly Power, „Boston University Law Review”, May 1984, vol. 64, No 3, s. 521–561.
Hubbard R., Applying the Rule of Reason to Resale Price Restraints: a Fresh Perspective, „Antitrust”, Fall 2014, vol. 29, s. 95–99.
Hubbard R., Protecting Consumers Post-Leegin, „Antitrust”, Fall 2007, s. 41–44.
Hughes E., The Left Side of Antitrust: What Fairness Means and Why it Matters, „Marquette Law Review” 2009, vol. 77, Issue 2, s. 265–306.
Impact Evaluations of Federal Trade Commission Vertical Restraint Cases, R. Lafferty, R. Lande, J. Kirkwood (eds.), FTC, August 1984.
Interview With Dennis W. Carlton, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Economic Analysis, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, „Antitrust Source”, February 2007, vol. 6, No 3, s. 1–12.
Ioannidou M., Nowag J., Can Two Wrongs Make a Right? Reconsidering Minimum Resale Price Maintenance in the Light of Allianz Hungária, „European Competition Journal” 2015, vol. 11, No 2–3, s. 340–366.
Ippolito P., Resale Price Maintenance. Economic Evidence from the Litigation, Bureau of Economics Staff Report, Federal Trade Commission, April 1988; dostępny pod adresem https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/resale-price-maintenance-economic-evidence-litigation/232122.pdf (dostęp: 23.06.2016).
Ippolito P., Resale Price Maintenance: Empirical Evidence from Litigation, „The Journal of Law & Economics”, October 1991, vol. 34, No 2, s. 263–294.
Jacobs M., An Essay on the Normative Foundations of Antitrust Economics, „North Carolina Law Review”, November 1995, s. 219–266.
Jardine R., Economic Law-Vertical Minimum Pricing in Leegin-Adrift With the Rule of Reason; Sinking With Stare Decisis; Leegin Creative Leather Prod., Inc. V. PSKS, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007), „Wyoming Law Review” 2008, vol. 8, s. 683–702.
Jedličková B., Resale Price Maintenance and Vertical Territorial Restrictions. Theory and Practice in EU Competition Law and US Antitrust Law, Cheltenham–Northampton 2016.
Joerges C., What Is Left of the European Economic Constitution? A Melancholic Eulogy, „European Law Review” 2005, vol. 30(4), s. 461–489.
Jones A., Resale Price Maintenance: A Debate About Competition Policy in Europe?, „European Competition Journal” 2009, vol. 5, No 2, s. 479–514.
Jones A., Sufrin B., EU Competition Law. Text Cases and Materials, ed. 6, Oxford 2016.
Jones B., Maximum Vertical Price Fixing: Making the Rule „Right”?, „Midwest Law Review” 2000, vol. 17, s. 69–84.
Jorde T., Lemley M., Summary Judgment in Antitrust Cases: Understanding Monsanto and Matsushita, „Antitrust Bulletin” 1991, vol. 36, s. 271–323.
Jurczyk Z., Koncepcja wpływu na handel między Państwami Członkowskimi – kryterium stosowania wspólnotowego prawa konkurencji (cz. I), „Prawo i Podatki Unii Europejskiej” 2007, nr 5, s. 40–46.
Jurkowska-Gomułka A., Publiczne i prywatne egzekwowanie zakazów praktyk ograniczających konkurencję, Warszawa 2013.
Jurkowska-Gomułka A., Stosowanie zakazu porozumień ograniczających konkurencję zorientowane na ocenę skutków ekonomicznych? Uwagi na tle praktyki decyzyjnej Prezesa Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów w odniesieniu do ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów z 2007 roku, „iKAR” 2012, nr 1(1), s. 33–49.
Kauper T., Influence of Conservative Economic Analysis on the Development of the Law of Antitrust, [w:] R. Pitofsky (ed.), How the Chicago Overshot the Mark. The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust, Oxford 2009.
Kaysen C., Turner D. F., Antitrust Policy: An Economic and Legal Study Analysis, Cambridge 1959.
Kelly C., Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.: The Final Blow To the Use of Per Se Rules in Judging Vertical Restraints – Why the Court Got It Wrong, „Northern Illinois University Law Review”, Summer 2008, vol. 28, s. 593–647.
Kelly K., The Role of the Free Rider in Resale Price Maintenance: the Loch Ness Monster of Antitrust Captured, „George Mason University Law Review”, Spring 1988, vol. 10, s. 327–381.
Kessler J., Waller S., International Trade and U.S. Antitrust Law, ed. 2, 2015, WEST/el. Kirkwood J., Lande R., The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency, „Notre Dame Law Review” 2008, vol. 84, s. 191–243.
Kjøblye L., The New Commission Guidelines on the Application of Article 81(3): An Economic Approach to Article 81, „European Competition Law Review” 2004, vol. 25, s. 566–577.
Klein B., Competitive Resale Price Maintenance in the Absence of Free Riding, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2009, vol. 76, s. 431–481.
Klein B., The Evolving Law and Economics of Resale Price Maintenance, „Journal of Law & Economics”, August 2014, vol. 57, Part 2, supplement, s. 161–179.
Klein B., Murphy K., Vertical Restraints as Contract Enforcement Mechanisms, „Journal of Law & Economics” 1988, vol. 31, s. 265–297.
Kleis M., Nicolaides P., The Concept of Undertaking in Education and Public Health Systems, „European State Aid Law Quarterly” 2006, vol. 3, s. 505–508.
Kleit A., Efficiencies Without Economists: The Early Years of Resale Price Maintenance, „Southern Economic Journal” 1993, vol. 59, s. 597–619.
Kneepkens M., Resale Price Maintenance: Economics Call For a More Balanced Approach, „European Competition Law Review” 2007, vol. 28(12), s. 656–664.
Kohutek K., Modernizacja instytucji zakazu nadużycia pozycji dominującej w prawie konkurencji: nowe koncepcje oraz metody stosowania prawa, „Przegląd Prawa Publicznego” 2010, vol. 6, s. 84–102.
Kohutek K., Praktyki wykluczające przedsiębiorstw dominujących, Warszawa 2012.
Korah V., The Future of Vertical Agreements Under E.C. Competition Law, „European Community Law Review” 1998, vol. 19(8), s. 506–513.
Korah V., The Judgment in Delimitis: A Milestone towards a Realistic Assessment of the Effects of an Agreement – or a Damp Squib?, „European Intellectual Property Review” 1992, vol. 5, s. 167–176.
Korah V., The Paucity of Economic Analysis in the EEC Decisions on Competition Tetra Pak II, „Current Legal Problems” 1993, vol. 46, Issue Part 2, s. 148–189.
Kovacic W., The Modern Evolution of U.S. Competition Policy Enforcement Norms, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2003, vol. 71, No 2, s. 377–478.
Kovacic W., Eversley D., An Assessment of Institutional Machinery: Methods Used in Competition Agencies and What Worked for Them, Raport International Competition Network, Competition Policy Implementation Working Group, Subgroup 2 on Experiences of Younger Agencies, dostępny pod adresem: https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/AEWG_CPIInstitutionalMachinery2007.pdf (dostęp: 23.06.2016).
Kovacic W., Hyman D., Competition Agency Design: What’s on the Menu?, „European Competition Journal” 2012, vol. 8, s. 527–538.
Kovacic W., Mariniello M., Competition Agency Design in Globalised Markets, E15 Expert Group on Competition Policy and the Trade System, Think Piece, dostępny pod adresem: http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/E15-Competition-Kovacic-and-Mariniello-FINAL.pdf (dostęp: 30.04.2016).
Kowalik-Bańczyk K., Pojęcie „wpływu na handel” jako kryterium stosowania przez sądy krajowe wspólnotowego prawa konkurencji, „Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego” 2008, nr 2, s. 24–30.
Kozak M., Umowa agencyjna w świetle artykułu 101 TFUE. Jak gonić króliczka, aby go nie złapać, „iKAR” 2012, nr 4(1), s. 28–43.
Kroes N., Preliminary Thoughts on Policy Review of Article 82. Wystąpienie w Fordham Corporate Law Institute, Nowy Jork, 23 września 2005 r., SPEECH/05/537, dostępny pod adresem: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-537_en.htm?locale=en (dostęp: 30.12.2018).
Kyprianides G. P., Should Resale Price Maintenance be Per Se Illegal, „European Competition Law Review” 2012, vol. 33, Issue 8, s. 376–385.
Lackshin H. N., Refusal to Sell: a Means of Achieving Resale Price Maintenance in Non-Fair-Trade States, „Texas Law Review” 1958, vol. 36, s. 799.
Laidler P., Konstytucja Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki. Przewodnik, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2007.
Lambert T., Dr. Miles is Dead. Now What?: Structuring a Rule of Reason for Evaluating Minimum Resale Price Maintenance, „William and Mary Law Review”, May 2009, vol. 50, s. 1937–2004.
Lande R., Wealth Transfer as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged, [w:] T. Sullivan (ed.), The Political Economy of the Sherman Act, Oxford–New York 1991.
Lande R., Wealth Transfers as the Original and Primary Concern of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged, „Hastings Law Journal” 1999, vol. 50, Issue 4, s. 871–957.
Lao M., Free Riding: An Overstated, and Unconvincing Explanation for Resale Price Maintenance, [w:] R. Pitofsky (ed.), How the Chicago Overshot the Mark. The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009, s. 196.
Lao M., Internet Retailing and „Free-Riding”: a Post-Leegin Antitrust Analysis, „Journal of Internet Law”, March 2011, vol. 14, No 9, s. 14–21.
Lao M., Resale Price Maintenance: The Internet Phenomenon and Free Rider Issues, „Antitrust Bulletin” 2010, vol. 55, s. 473–512.
Law M., Kim S., The Rise of the American Regulatory State: a View from the Progressive Era, [w:] D. Levi-Faur (ed.), Handbook of the Politics of Regulation, Cheltenham 2011.
Leary T., McDavid J., Should Leegin Finally Bury Old Man Miles?, „Antitrust”, Spring 2007, vol. 21, s. 66–71.
Ledbetter M., America’s Forgotten History. Part III: A Progressive Empire, [b.m.w.] 2014.
Lee L. W., Some Models of Antitrust Enforcement, „Southern Economic Journal” 1980, vol. 47, No 1, s. 147–155.
Lee S., Problems of Resale Price Maintenance, „Journal of Marketing”, January 1959, vol. 23, No 3, s. 274–281.
Leegin’s Unexplored „Change in Circumstance”: The Internet and Resale Price Maintenance, „Harvard Law Review”, April 2008, vol. 121, No 6, s. 1600–1621.
Lenaerts K., Gerard D., Decentralisation of EC Competition Law Enforcement: Judges in the Frontline, „World Competition” 2004, vol. 27, Issue 3, s. 313–349.
Lianos I., Commercial Agency Agreements, Vertical Restraints, and the Limits of Article 81(1) EC: Between Hierarchies and Networks, „Journal of Competition Law and Economics” 2007, vol. 3, Issue 4, s. 625–672.
Lianos I., Some Reflections on the Question of the Goals of EU Competition Law, CLES Working Paper Series 3/2013, dostępne pod adresem: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/cles/sites/cles/files/cles-3-2013new.pdf (dostęp 12.05.2019).
Lindsay M., Contact Lenses and Contact Sports: An Update of State RPM Laws, „Antitrust Source”, April 2017, vol. 16, No 5, s. 1–11.
Lindsay M., From the Prairie to the Ocean: More Developments in State RPM Law, „Antitrust Source”, August 2012, vol. 11, No 6, s. 1–6 i i–xv.
Lindsay M., Resale Price Maintenance and the World After Leegin, „Antitrust”, Fall 2007, vol. 22, s. 32–40.
Lodge T., Nourry A., European Commission Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy, „International Company and Commercial Law Review” 1997, vol. 8(6), s. 191–195.
Lopatka J., Solving the Monopoly Problem: Turner’s Try, „Antitrust Bulletin” 1996, vol. 41, s. 843–909.
Lopatka J., Stephen Breyer and Modern Antitrust: A Snug Fit, „Antitrust Bulletin” 1995, vol. 40, Issue 1, s. 1–97.
Louis M., Vertical Distributional Restraints Under Schwinn and Sylvania: An Argument for the Continuing Use of a Partial Per Se Approach, „Michigan Law Review” 1976, vol. 75, No 2, s. 275–310.
Lugard P., Hancher L., Honey, I Shrunk the Article! A Critical Assessment of the Commission’s Notice on Article 81(3) of the EC Treaty, „European Competition Law Review” 2004, vol. 25, s. 410–420.
Maci M., The Assessment of RPM under EU Competition Rules: Certain Inconsistencies Based on a Non-substantive Analysis, „European Competition Law Review” 2014, vol. 35, Issue 3, s. 103–109.
MacKey A., Smith D., The Empirical Effects of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance, June 16, 2014, dostępne pod adresem http://home.uchicago.edu/mackay/files/The%20Empirical%20Effects%20of%20MRPM.pdf (dostęp: 23.06.2016).
Makuch A. M., Decyzje podmiotów gospodarczych w ujęciu ekonomii behawioralnej, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania” 2012, nr 27, s. 125–148.
Mandorff M., Sahl J., The Role of the ‘Equally Efficient Competitor’ in the Assessment of Abuse of Dominance, Konkurrensverket Working Paper No 1, 2003 dostępne pod adresem http://www.konkurrensverket.se/globalassets/english/publications-and-decisions/the-role-of-the-equally-efficient-competitor-in-the-assessment-of-abuse-of-dominance. pdf (dostęp: 14.08.2018).
Manin P., The Treaty of Amsterdam, „Columbia Journal of European Law”, Winter–Spring, 1998, s. 1–26.
Marco Colino S., Reforming the Reform: the New Rules for Vertical Agreements in the EU Market Share Tresholds and Resale Price Maintenance, [w:] J.-F. Bellis, J. M. Beneyto (eds.), Reviewing Vertical Restraints in Europe. Reform, Key Issues and National Enforcement, Brussels 2012.
Marco Colino S., Vertical Agreements and Competition Law. A Comparative Study of the EU and US Regimes, Oxford–Portland 2010.
Marcos F., Sánchez Graell A., A Missing Step in the Modernisation Stairway of EU Competition Law – Any Role for Block Exemption Regulations in the Realm of Regulation 1/2003?, „The Competition Law Review”, July 2010, vol. 6, Issue 2, s. 183–201.
Marsden P., Whelan P., Re-examining Trans-atlantic Similarities and Divergences in Substantive and Procedural Competition Law, „Sedona Conference Journal”, Fall 2009, No 10, s. 23–42.
Martin A., The American Consumer Is not Well: Where Is Dr. Miles? [Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. V. PSKS, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2705 (2007)], „Washburn Law Journal”, Winter 2008, vol. 47, s. 581–604.
Marvel H., Resale Price Maintenance and the Rule of Reason, „Antitrust Source”, June 2008, vol. 7, No 5, s. 1–11.
Marvel H., The Resale Price Maintenance Controversy: Beyond the Conventional Wisdom, „Antitrust Law Journal”, Fall 1994, vol. 63, s. 59–92.
Marvel H., McCafferty S., Resale Price Maintenance and Quality Certification, „The Rand Journal of Economics”, Autumn 1984, vol. 15, No 3, s. 346–359.
Mason E. S., Economic Concentration and the Oligopoly Problem, Cambridge 1957.
Mason S., The Price is Right. After a Long Evolution in Case Law, Minimum Resale Price Agreements Are No Longer Per Se Illegal, „Los Angeles Lawyer”, April 2009, vol. 32, s. 29–35.
Mathewson G., Winter R., An Economic Theory of Vertical Restraints, „The RAND Journal of Economics”, Spring 1984, vol. 15, No 1, s. 27–38.
Mathewson G., Winter R., The Law and Economics of Resale Price Maintenance, „Review of Industrial Organization”, 1998, vol. 13, s. 57–84.
McGuire N., An Antitrust Narcotic: How the Rule of Reason is Lulling Vertical Enforcement to Sleep, „Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review” 2012, vol. 45, s. 1225–1294.
McLaren R., Territorial and Customer Restrictions, Consignments, Suggested Retail Prices and Refusals to Deal, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1968, vol. 37, s. 137–146.
McMillian L., The Proper Role of the Courts: The Mistakes of the Supreme Court in Leegin, „Wisconsin Law Review” 2008, s. 405–461.
Meese A., Assorted Anti-Leegin Canards: Why Resistance is Misguided and Futile, „Florida State University Law Review”, Summer 2013, vol. 40, s. 907–970.
Meese A., Property Rights and Intrabrand Restraints, „Cornell Law Review” 2003, vol. 89, s. 553–620.
Meese A., Reframing the (False?) Choice Between Purchaser Welfare and Total Welfare, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 81, Issue 5, s. 2197–2251.
Michaels R., The Functional Method of Comparative Law, [w:] M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford 2006.
Miron J., Jr., The Constitutionality of a Complexity Exception to the Seventh Amendment, „Chicago-Kent Law Review” 1998, vol. 73, Issue 3, s. 865–896.
Moeschel W., Vertical Price Fixing: Myths and Loose Thinking, „European Competition Law Review” 2013, vol. 34(5), s. 233.
Moloshok M., Dr. Miles – A Rock of Ages, „Antitrust Source”, February 2007, vol. 6, No 3, s. 1–9.
Möschel W., Competition Policy from an Ordo Point of View, [w:] A. Peacock, H. Willgerodt (eds.), Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution, London 1989.
Motta M., Competition Policy. Theory and Practice, Cambridge 2003.
Motta M., Rey P., Verboven F., Vettas N., Najcięższe ograniczenia w ramach Rozporządzenia o wyłączeniu blokowym porozumień wertykalnych: poglądy ekonomiczne, raport dostępny pod adresem http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/economist/hardcore_restrictions_under_BER.pdf (dostęp: 23.06.2018).
Nachbar T., The Antitrust Constitution, „Iowa Law Review” 2014, vol. 99, s. 57–114.
Nagy C., EU and US Competition Law: Divided in Unity? The Rule on Restrictive Agreements and Vertical Intra-brand Restraints, London–New York 2013.
Nagy C., Resale Price Fixing after the Revision of the EU Vertical Regime – a Comparative Perspective, „Acta Juridica Hungarica” 2013, vol. 54, No 4, s. 349–366.
Nagy C., The Distinction Between Anti-competitive Object and Effect After Allianz: The End of Coherence in Competition Analysis?, „World Competition” 2013, vol. 36, No 4, s. 541–564.
Nazerali J., Cowan D., Unlocking E.U. Distribution Rules – Has the European Commission Found the Right Keys?, „European Competition Law Review” 2000, vol. 21(1), s. 50–56.
Nihoul P., „Freedom of Choice”: the Emergence of a Powerful Concept in European Competition Law, [w:] P. Nihoul, N. Charbit, E. Ramundo (eds.), Choice – A New Standard for Competition Law Analysis?, „Concurrences Review” [New York] 2016.
Nowag J., Ioannidou M., Can Two Wrongs Make a Right? Reconsidering Minimum Resale Price Maintenance in the Light of Allianz Hungária, „European Competition Journal” 2015, vol. 11, No 2–3, s. 340–366.
Odudu O., Case C-369/04, Hutchison 3G UK Ltd and Others v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 June 2007, [2007] ECR-I 5247 and C-284/04, T-Mobile Austria GmbH and Others v. Republik Österreich, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 June 2007, [2007] ECR-I 5189, „Common Market Law Review” 2008, vol. 45, Issue 4, s. 1269–1277.
Odudu O., The Wider Concerns of Competition Law, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 2010, vol. 30, No 3, s. 599–613.
Olszewski J., Overruling Nearly a Century-Old Precedent: Why Leegin Got it Right, „Iowa Law Review” 2008, vol. 94, s. 375–412.
Opalenik A., Guiding the Lower Courts in the Aftermath of Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., „Capital University Law Review”, Summer 2009, vol. 37, s. 1201–1241. Orbach B., Antitrust’s Pursuit of Purpose, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 81, s. 2151–2156.
Ornstein S., Hanssens D., Resale Price Maintenance: Output Increasing or Restricting? The Case of Distilled Spirits in the United States, „Journal of Industrial Economics”, September 1987, vol. 36, No 1, s. 1–18.
Oster S., Levi Strauss, [w:] Impact Evaluations of Federal Trade Commission Vertical Restraint Cases, R. Lafferty, R. Lande, J. Kirkwood (eds.), FTC, August 1984, s. 47.
Overstreet T., Resale Price Maintenance: Economic Theories and Empirical Evidence, Bureau of Economics Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission, November 1983.
Overstreet T., Fisher A., Resale Price Maintenance and Distributional Efficiencies: Some Evidence from the Past, „Contemporary Economic Policy” 1985, vol. 3, Issue 3, s. 43–58.
Page W., The Chicago School and the Evolution of Antitrust: Characterization, Antitrust Injury, and Evidentiary Sufficiency, „Virginia Law Review”, October 1989, vol. 75, s. 1221–1398.
Paldor I., RPM as an Exclusionary Practice, „Antitrust Bulletin”, Summer 2010, vol. 55, No 2, s. 309–347.
Paldor I., The Vertical Restraints Paradox: Justifying the Different Legal Treatment of Price and Non-Price Vertical Restraints, „University of Toronto Law Journal”, Summer 2008, vol. 58, s. 317–353.
Peeperkorn L., New European Rules for Supply and Distribution Agreements, [w:] Reviewing Vertical Restraints in Europe. Reform, Key Issues and National Enforcement, J.-F. Bellis, J. M. Beneyto (eds.), Brussels 2012, s. 51.
Peeperkorn L., Resale Price Maintenance and its Alleged Efficiencies, „European Competition Journal” 2008, vol. 4(1), s. 201–212.
Peritz R., Competition Policy in America. History, Rhetoric, Law, Oxford 1996.
Piraino T., Jr., Reconciling the Per Se and Rule of Reason Approaches to Antitrust Analysis, „Southern California Law Review”, March 1991, vol. 64, s. 685–739.
Pitofsky R., Are Retailers Who Offer Discounts Really „Knaves”?: The Coming Challenge to the Dr. Miles Rule, „Antitrust”, Spring 2007, vol. 21, s. 61–65.
Pitofsky R., Does Antitrust Have a Future?, „Georgetown Law Journal” 1987, vol. 76, s. 321–337.
Pitofsky R., In Defense of Discounters: The No-Frills Case for a Per Se Rule Against Vertical Price Fixing, „Georgetown Law Journal” 1983, vol. 71, s. 1487–1495.
Pitofsky R., The Political Content of Antitrust, „University of Pennsylvania Law Review” 1979, vol. 127, s. 1051–1075.
Poddar D., Gill K., Australia: First Authorisation of Resale Price Maintenance?, „Journal of European Competition Law & Practice” 2016, vol. 7, No 3, s. 212–218.
Polden D., Antitrust Standing and the Rule Against Resale Price Maintenance, „Cleveland State Law Review” 1989, vol. 37, s. 179–226.
Pollock E., Alternative Distribution Methods After Schwinn, „Northwestern University Law Review” 1968, vol. 63, s. 595–610.
Posner R., Antitrust Policy and the Supreme Court: An Analysis of the Restricted Distribution, Horizontal Merger and Potential Competition Decisions, „Columbia Law Review” 1975, vol. 75, s. 282–327.
Posner R., The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis, „University of Pennsylvania Law Review”, April 1979, vol. 127, s. 925–948.
Posner R., The Next Step in the Antitrust Treatment of Restricted Distribution: Per Se Legality, „University of Chicago Law Review” 1981, vol. 48, s. 6–26.
Posner R., The Rule of Reason and the Economic Approach: Reflections on the Sylvania Decision, „University of Chicago Law Review” 1977, vol. 45, No 1, s. 1–20.
Powell J., Menendian S., Beyond Public/Private: Understanding Excessive Corporate Prerogative, „Kentucky Law Journal” 2011, vol. 100, s. 43–124.
Pugliese P., Mundim M., Legal Uncertainty on Resale Price Maintenance: the Brazilian Experience Following the „SKF Case”, „Journal of European Competition Law & Practice” 2014, vol. 5(7), s. 478–484.
Rabel E., Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung, München 1925, reprint w: E. Rabel, Gesammelte Aufsätze, vol. 3, Tübingen 1967.
Rabel E., On Institutes for Comparative Law, „Columbia Law Review” 1947, vol. 47, s. 227–237.
Rabel E., Recht des Warenkaufs, t. I, Berlin 1936. Rabel E., Recht des Warenkaufs, t. II, Berlin 1957.
Raymond H. J., Your Money or Your Line, „The New York Times”, February, 9, 1859.
Rees R., Competition Policy and Public Enterprise in the European Community, [w:] A. Mourik van (ed.), Development in European Community Policy, EIPA, Maastricht 1996.
Reeves T., Brentford P., A New Competition Policy for a New Millennium?, „International Company and Commercial Law Review” 2000, vol. 11(3), s. 75–81.
Reimann M., The Progress and Failure of Comparative Law in The Second Half of the Twentieth Century, „American Journal of Comparative Law” 2002, vol. 50, No 4, s. 671–700.
Reindl A. P., Resale Price Maintenance and Article 101: Developing a More Sensible Analytical Approach, „Fordham International Law Journal” 2011, vol. 33, Issue 4, s. 1300–1333.
Rey P., Tirole J., The Logic of Vertical Restraints, „The American Economic Review”, December 1986, vol. 76, No 5, s. 921–939.
Rheinstein M., Comparative Law-Its Functions, Methods, and Usages, „Arkansas Law Review & Bar Association Journal” 1968, vol. 22, No 3, s. 415–425.
Rheinstein M., Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, ed. 2, München 1987.
Ridyard D., Economic Analysis of Single Firm and Oligopolistic Dominance under the European Merger Regulation, „European Competition Law Review” 1994, vol. 15, s. 255–262.
Rieter H., Schmolz M., The Ideas of German Ordoliberalism 1938–45: Pointing the Way to a New Economic Order, „European Journal of the History of Economic Thought” 1993, vol. 1, Issue 1, s. 87–114.
Robinson S., Recent Antitrust Developments: 1974, „Columbia Law Review” 1975, vol. 75, s. 243–281.
Rodger B. J., Competition Policy, Liberalism and Globalization: A European Perspective. „Columbia Journal of International Law” 2000, vol. 6, Issue 3, s. 289–320.
Romano R., Double Moral Hazard and Resale Price Maintenance, „The RAND Journal of Economics”, Autumn 1994, vol. 25, No 3, s. 455–466.
Röpke W., German Commercial Policy, London 1934.
Roszkowski M., State Oil Company v. Khan and the Rule of Reason: The End of Intrabrand Competition?, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1998, vol. 66, No 3, s. 613–640.
Roszkowski M., Vertical Maximum Price Fixing: in Defense of Albrecht, „Loyola University Chicago Law Journal” 1992, vol. 23, Issue 2, s. 209–239.
Roundtable Conference with Enforcement Officials, „Antitrust Source”, April 2009, vol. 8, No 4, s. 1–15.
Rüstow A., Interessenpolitik oder Staatspolitik, „Der Deutsche Volkswirt” [Berlin] 1932, Bd. 7, Nr 6, s. 169–172.
Rüstow A., Zwischen Kapitalismus und Kommunismus, „ORDO” 1949, s. 100–169.
Ryan S., Fountoukakos K., A New Substantive Test for EU Merger Control, „European Competition Law Review” 2005, vol. 26, s. 277–296.
Sabbey N., Private Antitrust Suits: The In Pari Delicto Defense, „Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review”, Fall 1968, vol. 10, Issue 1, s. 172–180.
Salop S., Question: What Is the Real and Proper Antitrust Welfare Standard? Answer: The True Consumer Welfare Standard, „Loyola Consumer Law Review” 2010, vol. 22, s. 336–353.
Sauter W., The Economic Constitution of the European Union, „Columbia Journal of European Law”, Winter–Spring 1998, s. 27–68.
Schechter R., A Retrospective on the Reagan FTC: Musings on the Role of an Administrative Agency, „Administrative Law Review”, Fall 1990, vol. 42, No 4, s. 489–517.
Scherer F., Ross D., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, ed. 3, Boston 1990.
Schmitthoff M., The Science of Comparative Law, „The Cambridge Law Journal” 1939, vol. 7, Issue 1, s. 94–110.
Schwab A., Steinle C., Pitfalls of the European Competition Network – why Better Protection of Leniency Applicants and Legal Regulation of Case Allocation is Needed, „European Competition Law Review” 2008, vol. 29(9), s. 523–531.
Shepard L., The Economic Effects of Repealing Fair Trade Laws, „The Journal of Consumer Affairs”, Winter 1978, vol. 12, No 2, s. 220–236.
Silcock T., Some Problems of Price Maintenance, „Economic Journal” 1938, vol. 48, No 189, s. 42–51.
Simon H. A., Motivational and Emotional Controls of Cognition, „Psychological Review” 1967, vol. 74, No 1, s. 29–39.
Simon H. A., Podejmowanie decyzji kierowniczych, Warszawa 1982.
Shulman H., The Fair Trade Acts and the Law of Restrictive Agreements Affecting Chattels, „The Yale Law Journal”, February 1940, vol. 49, No 4, s. 607–625.
Skarzyński R., Państwo i społeczna gospodarka rynkowa. Główne idee polityczne ordoliberalizmu, Warszawa 1994.
Skoczny T., Instytucjonalne modele wdrażania reguł konkurencji na świecie – wnioski dla Polski, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2011, nr 2, s. 77–98.
Skoczny T., Podstawy i zakres wspólnotowego prawa konkurencji, [w:] J. Barcz (red.), Prawo Unii Europejskiej. Zagadnienia systemowe, prawo materialne i polityki, Warszawa 2003.
Skoczny T., W sprawie modernizacji stosowania zakazu nadużywania pozycji dominującej, [w:] C. Banasiński (red.), Ochrona konkurencji i konsumentów w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej (studia prawno-ekonomiczne), Warszawa 2005.
Skitol R., The Shifting Sands of Antitrust Policy: Where it Has Been, Where it is Now, Where it Will Be in its Third Century, „Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy”, Fall 1999, vol. 9, Issue 1, s. 239–266.
Soames T., Maudhuit S., Changes in EU Merger Control: Part 2, „European Competition Law Review” 2005, vol. 26, s. 75–82.
Soyez F., The Compatibility of MFN Clauses with EU Competition Law, „European Competition Law Review” 2015, vol. 36(3), s. 107–111.
Stedman J. C., The German Decartelization Program the Law in Repose, „University of Chicago Law Review” 1950, vol. 17, Issue 3, s. 441–457.
Stefano G. de, The New EU „Vertical Restraints Regulation”: Navigating the Vast Sea beyond Safe Harbours and Hardcore Restrictions, „European Competition Law Review” 2010, vol. 31(12), s. 487–490.
Steiner J., Woods L., Twigg-Flesner Ch., EU Law, Oxford 2006.
Steiner R., How Manufacturers Deal with the Price-Cutting Retailer: When Are Vertical Restraints Efficient?, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1997, vol. 65, No 2, s. 407–448.
Steuer R., Khan and the Issue of Dealer Power-Overview, „Antitrust Law Journal” 1998, vol. 66, s. 531–536.
Streit M., Economic Order, Private Law and Public Policy: The Freiburg School of Law and Economics in Perspective, „Journal of International and Theoretical Economics” 1992, vol. 148, s. 675–704.
Streit M., Mussler W., The Economic Constitution of the European Community: From „Rome” to „Maastricht”, „European Law Journal” 1995, vol. 5, s. 5–30.
Stucke M., Reconsidering Antitrust’s Goals, „Boston College Law Review” 2012, vol. 53, s. 551–629.
Subiotto R., Amato F., The Reform of the European Competition Policy Concerning Vertical Restraints, „Antitrust Law Journal” 2001, vol. 69, s. 147–193.
Sufrin B., The Evolution of Article 81 (3) of the EC Treaty, „Antitrust Bulletin”, Winter 2006, vol. 51, No 4, s. 915–981.
Sullivan L., Hanbook of the Law of Antitrust, Saint Paul 1977.
Sullivan L., Grimes W., Sagers C., The Law of Antitrust. An Integrated Handbook, ed. 3, Saint Paul 2016.
Svetlicinii A., Bernatt M., Botta M., The „Dark Matter” in EU Competition Law: Non-Infringement Decisions in the New EU Member States Before and After Tele 2 Polska, „European Law Review”, June 2018, vol. 43(3), s. 424–446.
Szpringer W., Pozaeuropejskie ustawy antymonopolowe, Warszawa 1995.
Taralson J., What Would Sherman Do? Overturning the Per Se Illegality of Minimum Vertical Price Restraints Under the Sherman Act in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. Was not as Reasonable as it Seemed, „Hamline Law Review”, Spring 2008, vol. 31, s. 549–591.
Taussig F., Price Maintenance, „American Economic Review” 1916, vol. 6, No 1, supplement, s. 170–184.
Telser L., Why Should Manufacturers Want Fair Trade?, „The Journal of Law & Economics”, October 1960, vol. 3, s. 86–105.
Tokarczyk R., Komparatystyka prawnicza, Warszawa 2008.
Tor A., Rinner W., Behavioral Antitrust: a New Approach to the Rule of Reason after Leegin, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2011, s. 805–863.
Townley C., Article 81 EC and Public Policy, Oxford 2009.
Trebilcock M., Iacobucci E., Designing Competition Law Institutions: Values, Structure, and Mandate, „Loyola University Chicago Law Journal” 2010, vol. 41, Issue 3, s. 455–477.
Turner D., The Durability, Relevance, and Future of American Antitrust Policy, „California Law Review” 1987, vol. 75, No 3, s. 797–815.
Ullrich H., Joined Cases 25 and 26/84, Ford Werke A.G. and Ford of Europe Inc. v. Commission of the European Communities, Judgment of 17 September 1985. Application under Art. 173(2) of the EEC Treaty for a declaration that the Commission decision of 16 November 1983 (O. J. 1983, L 327/31) relating to a procedure under Art. 85 EEC Treaty was void, „Common Market Law Review” 1986, vol. 23, Issue 2, s. 449–465.
Ulrich R. G., United States v. Parke Davis, „Marquette Law Review”, Summer 1960, vol. 44, Issue 1, Article 11, s. 120–125.
Vaheesan S., The Evolving Populism of Antitrust, „Nebraska Law Review” 2014, vol. 93, Issue 2, s. 370–428.
Vandenborre I., Frese M. J., Most Favoured Nation Clauses Revisited, „European Competition Law Review” 2014, vol. 35(12), s. 588–593.
Varney C., Antitrust Federalism: Enhancing Federal/State Cooperation, remarks delivered at Columbia Law School, October 7, 2009, dostępne pod adresem http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/250635.pdf (dostęp: 2.05.2016).
Varney C., A Post-Leegin Approach to Resale Price Maintenance Using a Structured Rule of Reason, „Antitrust”, Fall 2009, vol. 24, s. 22–26.
Velez M., The Tenuous Evolution of Resale Price Maintenance, „European Competition Law Review” 2011, vol. 32, Issue 6, s. 297–302.
Venit J., Cooperation, Initiative and Regulation – A Cross Cultural Inquiry, [w:] C.-D. Ehlermann, M. Marquis (eds.), European Competition Law Annual 2007: A Reformed Approach to Article 82 EC, London 2008.
Verhoef P. C., Neslin S. A., Vroomen B., Multichannel Customer Management: Understanding the Research Shopper Phenomenon, „International Journal of Research in Marketing” 2007, vol. 24, s. 129–148.
Verras N., Resale Price Maintenance in E.U. Competition Law: Thoughts in Relation to the Vertical Restraints Review Procedure, „The Columbia Journal of Law Online” 2009, vol. 16, s. 37–41.
Vickers J., Competition Law and Economics: a Mid-Atlantic Viewpoint, „European Competition Journal” 2007, vol. 3, No 1, s. 1–15.
Vickers J., Merger Policy in Europe. Retrospect and Prospect, „European Competition Law Review” 2004, vol. 25, s. 455–463.
Voorhees T., Jr., Reasoning Through the Rule of Reason for RPM, „Antitrust”, Fall 2012, vol. 28, s. 58–63.
Waller S., Justice Stevens and the Rule of Reason, „Southern Methodist University Law Review” 2009, vol. 62, s. 693–724.
Waller S., Popal O., The Fall and Rise of the Antitrust Class Actions, „World Competition” 2016, vol. 39, Issue 1, s. 29–55.
Weitbrecht A., From Freiburg to Chicago and Beyond – the First 50 Years of European Competition Law, „European Competition Law Review” 2008, vol. 29, Issue 22, s. 81–88.
Wells W. C., Antitrust and the Formation of the Postwar World, New York 2003. Whish R., Bailey D., Competition Law, ed. 9, Oxford 2018.
Wijckmans F., Tuytschaever F., Vertical Agreements in EU Competition Law, Oxford 2011.
Winter R., Vertical Control and Price Versus Nonprice Competition, „The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, February 1993, vol. 108, No 1, s. 61–76.
Winterscheid J., Ward M., Two Part Harmony: New Rules for Vertical Agreements Under European Union Competition Policy, „Antitrust”, Summer 2000, vol. 14, s. 52–56.
Witt A. C., The More Economic Approach to EU Antitrust Law, Oxford–Portland 2016.
Wolff R., Holthausen D., The Control of Retail Prices Under the Fair Trade Laws, „Dun’s Review”, July 1938, vol. 46, s. 15–22.
Wright J., The Economics of Resale Price Maintenance & Implications for Competition Law and Policy, Statement Before the British Institute of International and Comparative Law of April 9, dostępne pod adresem: https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2014/04/economics-resale-price-maintenance-implications-competition-law-policy-0 (dostęp: 23.06.2016).
Wright J., Ginsburg D., The Goals of Antitrust: Welfare Trumps Choice, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 81, s. 2405–2423.
Yamey B., Introduction: The Main Economic Issues, [w:] Resale Price Maintenance: A Comparative American-European Perspective, B. Yamey (ed.), Chicago 1966.
Yamey B., Origins of Resale Price Maintenance, „Economic Journal” 1952, vol. 62, No 247, s. 522–545.
Yamey B., Resale Price Maintenance, Chicago 1966.
Yamey B., The Economics of Resale Price Maintenance, New York–London 1954.
Zawłocka-Turno A., Turno B., Ustalanie sztywnych lub minimalnych cen odsprzedaży jako porozumienie ograniczające konkurencję ze względu na cel (przedmiot) w prawie unijnym, „Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2011, nr 4, s. 71–87.
Zevgolis N. E., Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) in European Competition Law: Legal Certainty Versus Economic Theory?, „European Competition Law Review” 2013, vol. 34, Issue 1, s. 25–32.
Zhang J., Farris P. W., Irvin J. W., Kushwaha T., Steenburgh T. J., Weitz B. A., Crafting Integrated Multichannel Retailing Strategies, working paper 09-125, Harvard Business School, dostępny pod adresem https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/09-125.pdf (dostęp: 5.06.2016).
Zimmerman E., Distribution Restrictions After Sealy and Schwinn, „Antitrust Bulletin” 1967, vol. 12, s. 1181–1189.
Zimmermann A., Sony, Samsung Rein In Retailers’ Discounts on TVs, „The Wall Street Journal”, 23 maja 2012 r., dostępny pod adresem http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304791704577420383631021786 (dostęp: 12.03.2016).
Zorn B., Feldman G., Business Under the New Price Laws, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York 1937.
Zweigert K., Methodological Problems in Comparative Law, „Israel Law Review” 1972, vol. 7, Issue 4, s. 465–474.
Zweigert K., Kötz H, Introduction to Comparative Law, ed. 3, Oxford 1998.
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Opublikowane: 30 stycznia 2025
Zdrowie psychiczne dzieci i młodzieży jest kluczowym tematem w działaniach profilaktycznych skierowanych do młodych ludzi.
Opublikowane: 16 stycznia 2025
Serdecznie zapraszamy na spotkanie poświęcone przekształceniom Placu Wolności, planowaniu miast dawniej i dziś oraz aktualnej polityce miejskiej.
Opublikowane: 2 stycznia 2025
Zapraszamy na spotkanie z prof. Wojciechem Woźniakiem – autorem książki „Państwo, które działa. O fińskich politykach publicznych”.