Zastosowanie narzędzi AI w praktyce akademickiej: Wsparcie tworzenia i weryfikacja prac dyplomowych

Milan Popović; Michał Błaszczyk

doi:10.18778/8445-081-9

Słowa kluczowe: sztuczna inteligencja, duże modele językowe, praca dyplomowa, szkolnictwo wyższe

Opublikowane: 30 października 2026

Kategorie: Ekonomia i zarządzanie

Pliki do pobrania

E-book fragment

Monografia podejmuje problematykę wykorzystania narzędzi sztucznej inteligencji w praktyce akademickiej, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem procesu dyplomowania. Punktem wyjścia jest przekonanie, że upowszechnienie dużych modeli językowych zmienia warunki, w jakich funkcjonuje współczesna dydaktyka akademicka, i skłania do ponownego namysłu nad tym, czemu właściwie służy praca dyplomowa oraz jakie kompetencje powinna potwierdzać. Autorzy proponują krytyczną refleksję nad przemianami modelu kształcenia i nad tym, gdzie przebiega granica między wsparciem narzędziowym a wyręczeniem autora.
Część teoretyczna książki obejmuje definicje i typologie sztucznej inteligencji, podstawy uczenia maszynowego oraz genezę i zasady działania dużych modeli językowych. Właściwy ciężar wywodu spoczywa jednak na badaniach własnych, których wyniki trudno uznać za neutralne dla środowiska akademickiego. Pierwsze z nich odsłania rzeczywistą skalę obecności AI w warsztacie piszących prace dyplomowe oraz pokazuje, jak szybko przesuwa się ona z marginesu do centrum procesu badawczego. Inne stawia pytanie czy doświadczony naukowiec rozpozna tekst wygenerowany przez model językowy. Zestawienie odpowiedzi respondentów z faktycznym autorstwem ocenianych fragmentów prowadzi do wniosków, które podważają zaufanie do intuicyjnych metod weryfikacji i wyznaczają punkt wyjścia dla rekomendacji adresowanych do uczelni, promotorów i studentów.

Abbas M., Jam F.A., Khan T.I., Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students, „International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education” 2024, t. 21, art. 10.

Afifah A., Preserving academic integrity in the age of AI, [w:] Proceedings of The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2024, IAFOR, 2024.

AI Obserwator, Prompt: co to jest i jak pisać go tak, żeby AI naprawdę pomogła, 2025, https://www.aiobserwator.pl/prompt-co-to-jest-i-jak-pisac/ (dostęp: 23.11.2025).

Alanazi A., Using machine learning for healthcare challenges and opportunities, „Informatics in Medicine Unlocked” 2022, t. 30.

Alansari A., Luqman H., Large language models hallucination: A comprehensive survey, arXiv:2510.06265, 2025.

Albtoush A., ChatGPT: Revolutionizing user interactions with advanced natural language processing, „International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication” 2023, t. 11, nr 9.

An Q., Rahman S., Zhou J., Kang J.J., A comprehensive review on machine learning in healthcare industry: Classification, restrictions, opportunities and challenges, „Sensors” 2023, t. 23, nr 9.

Banerjee S., Agarwal A., Singla S., LLMs will always hallucinate, and we need to live with this, arXiv:2409.05746, 2024.

Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A.M., Frith U., Does the autistic child have a „theory of mind”?, „Cognition” 1985, t. 21, nr 1.

Bastani H., Bastani O., Sungu A. et al., Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 2025, t. 122(26).

Bestvater S., Hultin L., The AI era in academic integrity: Generative AI and the state of current policies at top US universities, „Higher Education Policy” 2024, t. 37, nr 3.

Bostrom N., Yudkowsky E., The ethics of artificial intelligence, [w:] The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014.

Breiman L., Random forests, „Machine Learning” 2001, t. 45.

Brooks R.A., Intelligence without representation, „Artificial Intelligence” 1991, t. 47, nr 1–3.

Brown T.B. et al., Language models are few-shot learners, [w:] Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, t. 33, Curran Associates, Red Hook 2020.

Buolamwini J., Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification, [w:] Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, 2018.

Celebi M.E., Aydin K., Unsupervised Learning Algorithms, Springer, Cham 2016.

Chalmers D.J., The Character of Consciousness, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.

Chelli M., Descamps J., Lavoué V., Trojani C., Azar M., Deckert M., Raynier J.-L., Clowez G., Boileau P., Ruetsch‑Chelli C., Hallucination rates and reference accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for systematic reviews: Comparative analysis, „Journal of Medical Internet Research” 2024, t. 26, e53164.

Cheng T., Su J., Yuan G., He J., Liu X., Tao J., Xie J., Li H., Chain-of-thought prompting obscures hallucination cues in large language models: An empirical evaluation, arXiv:2506.17088, 2025.

Cochran W.G., The χ² test of goodness of fit, „The Annals of Mathematical Statistics” 1952, t. 23, nr 3.

Colelough C., Bartels D., Demner-Fushman D., Quantifying hallucinations in large language models on medical textbooks, arXiv:2603.09986v2, 2026.

Coole M., Doudle W., Lockhart N., Yuan S., The negative impact of AI on academic integrity in tertiary education, „Australian Cybersecurity Magazine” 2024, t. 3, nr 12.

Culkin R., Das S.R., Machine learning in finance: The case of deep learning for option pricing, „Journal of Investment Management” 2017, t. 15, nr 4.

Dang A.-H., Vu T., Nguyen L.-M., Survey and analysis of hallucinations in large language models: Attribution to prompting strategies or model behavior, „Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence” 2025, t. 8, art. 1622292.

Deng J., Lin Y., The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview, „Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems” 2022, t. 2, nr 2.

Dixon M.F., Halperin I., Bilokon P., Machine Learning in Finance, Springer International Publishing, New York 2020.

Domingos P., A few useful things to know about machine learning, „Communications of the ACM” 2012, t. 55, nr 10.

Domingos P., The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World, Basic Books, New York 2015.

Dramsch J.S., 70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review, „Advances in Geophysics” 2020, t. 61.

Edwards A.S., Kaplan B., Jie T., A primer on machine learning, „Transplantation” 2021, t. 105, nr 4.

Enago, The dangers of over-dependence on AI in research writing, „Enago Academy” 2025, https://www.enago.com/academy/ai-overdependence-academic-writing-risks (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

European Commission, National strategies on Artificial Intelligence – Country report: Poland, European Commission Knowledge4Policy, 2019, https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/poland-ai-strategy-report.pdf (dostęp: 8.05.2026).

FIET (UKFIET), The impact of no-AI writing on academic integrity, 2025, https://www.ukfiet.org/2025/the-impact-of-no-ai-writing-on-academic-integrity/

Fodor J.A., Pylyshyn Z.W., Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis, „Cognition” 1988, t. 28, nr 1–2.

Freund Y., Schapire R.E., A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, „Journal of Computer and System Sciences” 1997, t. 55, nr 1.

Géron A., Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, wyd. 2, O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol 2019.

Goodfellow I., Bengio Y., Courville A., Deep Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge 2016.

Goodfellow I., Pouget-Abadie J., Mirza M., Xu B., Warde-Farley D., Ozair S., Courville A., Bengio Y., Generative adversarial nets, „Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems” 2014, t. 27.

Gravel J., D’Amours-Gravel M., Osmanlliu E., Learning to fake it: Limited responses and fabricated references provided by ChatGPT for medical questions, „Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health” 2023, t. 1(3).

Habehh H., Gohel S., Machine learning in healthcare, „Current Genomics” 2021, t. 22, nr 4.

Haleem A., Javaid M., Singh R.P., An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges, „BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations” 2022, t. 2, nr 4.

Halevy A., Norvig P., Pereira F., The unreasonable effectiveness of data, „IEEE Intelligent Systems” 2009, t. 24, nr 2.

Hao H., Razali A.B., Impact of ChatGPT on English academic writing ability and engagement of Chinese EFL undergraduates, „International Journal of Instruction” 2025, t. 18, nr 2.

Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J., The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, wyd. 2, Springer, New York, 2009.

Haugeland J., Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea, MIT Press, Cambridge 1985.

Hausman N., Rigbi O., Weisburd S., Generative AI in universities: Grades up, signals down, skills in flux, „VoxEU Column”, CEPR, 2024, https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/generative-ai-universities-grades-signals-down-skills-flux (dostęp: 30.08.2026).

Hinton G.E., Osindero S., Teh Y.W., A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, „Neural Computation” 2006, t. 18, nr 7.

Hochreiter S., Schmidhuber J., Long short-term memory, „Neural Computation” 1997, t. 9, nr 8.

Hohman F., Wongsuphasawat K., Kery M.B., Patel K., Understanding and visualizing data iteration in machine learning, [w:] Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020.

Hongxia H., Razali A.B., Impact of ChatGPT on English academic writing ability and engagement of Chinese EFL undergraduates, „International Journal of Instruction” 2025, t. 18, nr 2.

Hopfield J.J., Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” 1982, t. 79, nr 8.

Hosseini M., Gordijn B., Kaebnick G.E. et al., Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntary, „Journal of the American Medical Association” 2025, t. 334, nr 1.

Huang Y., Sun L., Harnessing the power of ChatGPT in fake news: An in-depth exploration in generation, detection and explanation, arXiv:2310.05046, 2023.

Hui F., Sun J., An application of support vector machine to companies’ financial distress prediction, [w:] Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence: Third International Conference, MDAI 2006, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg 2006.

Jia W., Pan L., Neary S., Effect of GenAI dependency on university students’ academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and moderating role of perceived teacher caring, „Behavioral Sciences” 2025, t. 15(10), art. 1348.

Jiang S., Mohamed A., Impact of ChatGPT on English academic writing ability, „International Journal of Instruction” 2024, t. 18, nr 2.

Jordan M.I., Mitchell T.M., Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects, „International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics” 2015, t. 6, nr 1.

Jurafsky L., Martin J.H., Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River–London 2000.

Koren Y., Bell R., Volinsky C., Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, „Computer” 2009, t. 42, nr 8.

Korf R.E., Planning as search: A quantitative approach, „Artificial Intelligence” 1987, t. 33, nr 1.

Kovari A., Ethical use of ChatGPT in education – Best practices to mitigate risks, „Frontiers in Education” 2025, t. 9, art. 1465703.

Krizhevsky A., Sutskever I., Hinton G.E., ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, „Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems” 2012, t. 25.

Laird J.E., Newell A., Rosenbloom P.S., Soar: An architecture for general intelligence, „Artificial Intelligence” 1987, t. 33, nr 1.

LeCun Y., Bengio Y., Hinton G., Deep learning, „Nature” 2015, nr 521(7553).

LeCun Y., Bottou L., Bengio Y., Haffner P., Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, „Proceedings of the IEEE” 1998, t. 86, nr 11.

Lee R., Doh J., Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study, „Computers & Education” 2024, t. 215, art. 105024.

Liu B., Xiao B., Jiang X. et al., Adversarial attacks on large language model-based systems and mitigating strategies: A case study on ChatGPT, „Security and Communication Networks” 2023, nr 1.

Liu P. et al., Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing, arXiv:2107.13586, 2021.

Liu W. et al., Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing, „ACM Computing Surveys” 2023, t. 56, nr 1.

Liu W., Ouyang W., Wang X. et al., Deep learning for generic object detection: A survey, „International Journal of Computer Vision” 2020, t. 128.

Lukianova L., Symela K., Religa J., Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Scientific and educational convergence in the Polish-Ukrainian context, „The New Educational Review” 2025, t. 81, nr 3.

Lund D., Wang T., Chatting about ChatGPT: How AI and GPT impact academia and libraries, „Library Hi Tech News” 2023, t. 40, nr 3.

Magister na 5, Obrona pracy dyplomowej – kompletny poradnik, 2024, https://magisterna5.pl/obrona-pracy-dyplomowej/ (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Martinez R. et al., Artificial Intelligence: Short History, Present Developments, and Future Outlook. Final Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2019.

McCarthy J., What is Artificial Intelligence?, Stanford University, Stanford 2006.

McCarthy J., Minsky M., Rochester N., Shannon C.E., A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, 1955, https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html (dostęp: 30.08.2026).

McCulloch W.S., Pitts W., A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity, „The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics” 1943, t. 5, nr 4.

Mikolov T. et al., Recurrent neural network based language model, [w:] Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), 2010.

Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki, Testy wiedzy – tworzenie i stosowanie w weryfikacji efektów uczenia się, https://kwalifikacje.gov.pl/publikacja/testy-wiedzy-tworzenie-i-stosowanie-w-weryfikacji-efektow-uczenia-sie/ (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Minsky M., McCarthy J., Proceedings of the Dartmouth Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Dartmouth College, Hanover 1956.

Minsky M., Papert S., Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry, MIT Press, Cambridge 1969.

Mitchell M., Wu S., Zaldivar A., Barnes P., Vasserman L., Hutchinson B., Spitzer E., Raji I. D., Gebru T., Model cards for model reporting, [w:] Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, PMLR, 2019.

Mitchell T.M., Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill, New York 1997.

Mittelstadt B., Interpretability and transparency in artificial intelligence, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021.

Mizuki A., Bridging the preparedness gap: A normative framework for AGI rights and personhood, „AI and Ethics” 2026, t. 6(2), art. 174.

Mohammed R., Will AI revolutionise marking?, „Times Higher Education” 2025, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/will-ai-revolutionise-marking (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Mohsin A. et al., On the fundamental limits of LLMs at scale, arXiv:2511.12869, 2025.

Moravec H.P., Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1988.

Murphy K.P., Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012.

National University, Step‑by‑step dissertation guide, National University Blog, październik 2025, https://www.nu.edu/blog/step-by-step-dissertation-guide/ (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Newell A., Simon H.A., Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search, „Communications of the ACM” 1976, t. 19, nr 3.

Newell A., Simon H.A., GPS, a program that simulates human thought, [w:] Lernende Automaten, München 1961.

Newell A., Simon H.A., Shaw J.C., The logic theory machine. A complex information processing system, „IRE Transactions on Information Theory” 1956, t. 2, nr 3.

Newton P., Xiromeriti M., ChatGPT performance on multiple choice question examinations in higher education. A pragmatic scoping review, „Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education” 2024, t. 49, nr 6.

Nilsson N.J., The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.

OpenAI, ChatGPT, https://chatgpt.com (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Packback, Moving beyond plagiarism and AI detection: Academic integrity in 2025, 2025, https://packback.co/resources (dostęp: 3.12.2025);

Pendyala S., Machine Learning for Societal Improvement, Modernization, and Progress, IGI Global, 2022.

Pitts G., Rani N., Mildort W., Cook E.-M., Students’ reliance on AI in higher education: Identifying contributing factors, arXiv:2506.13845, 2025.

Proudfoot B.J., Copeland J., Alan Turing’s forgotten ideas in computer science, „Scientific American” 1999, t. 280, nr 4.

Pylyshyn Z.W., Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge 1984.

QAA, Ethical considerations for using generative AI in higher education, 2023, https://www.qaa.ac.uk/sector-resources/generative-artificial-intelligence/ethical-considerations (dostęp: 7.05.2026).

Quinlan J.R., Bagging, boosting, and C4.5, [w:] Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1996.

Rada Ministrów RP, Polityka Cyfrowej Transformacji Edukacji, Warszawa 2024, https://www.kuratorium.waw.pl/download/1/23490/4Zalacznikdouchwaly-PCTE.pdf (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Radford A. et al., Language Models Are Unsupervised Multitask Learners, OpenAI, San Francisco 2019.

Ranganathan P., Aggarwal R., Pramesh C.S., Designing and validating a research questionnaire – Part 1, „Indian Journal of Surgery” 2023, t. 85, nr 6.

Ray P., ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope, „Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems” 2023, t. 3.

Reiter L., Jörling M., Fuchs C. et al., Student (mis)use of generative AI Tools for university-related tasks, „International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction” 2025, t. 41, nr 19, https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2462083

Reynolds L., McDonell K., Prompt programming for large language models: Beyond the few-shot paradigm, [w:] CHI ’21 Extended Abstracts (Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts), ACM, 2021.

Ribeiro M.T., Singh S., Guestrin C., „Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier, [w:] Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016.

Ristiliana, R., Husniati L., Zaki A., Beyond exams: Alternative assessment methods for holistic student evaluation, „Journal of Educational Teaching and Trends” 2025, t. 1, nr 1.

Rogers M., Dyfuzja innowacji, Narodowe Centrum Kultury, Warszawa 2024.

Ros-Arlanzón P., Gutarra-Ávila R., Arrarte-Esteban V., Bertomeu-González V., Hernández-Blasco L., Masiá M., Navarro-Canto L., Nieto-Navarro J., Abarca J., Sempere A.P., When AI models take the exam: Large language models vs medical students on multiple-choice course exams, „Medical Education Online” 2025, t. 30, nr 1, art. 2592430.

Rosenblatt F., The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain, „Psychological Review” 1958, t. 65, nr 6.

Rothman D., Transformers for Natural Language Processing: Build Innovative Deep Neural Network Architectures for NLP with Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow, BERT, RoBERTa, and More, Packt Publishing, Birmingham 2021.

Roumeliotis I., Tselikas N.D., ChatGPT and OpenAI models: A preliminary review, „Future Internet” 2023, t. 15, nr 6.

Ruiz M., Capstones: The first step to your professional future, Harbour.Space Blog” 2022, https://harbour.space/high-tech-entrepreneurship/articles/capstones-the-first-step-to-your-professional-future (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J., Learning representations by back-propagating errors, „Nature” 1986, t. 323, nr 6088.

Russell S.J., Norvig P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, wyd. 4, Pearson, Harlow 2021.

Russell S.J., Norvig P., Defining artificial intelligence, [w:] Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, wyd. 4, Pearson, Harlow 2021.

Russell S.J., Norvig P., Problem-solving agents, [w:] Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, wyd. 4, Pearson, Harlow 2021.

Russell S., Norvig P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, wyd. 3, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2016.

Sahoo P. et al., A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and Applications, arXiv:2402.07927v2, 2025.

Samuel A.L., Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers, „IBM Journal of Research and Development” 1959, t. 3, nr 3.

Sanz‑Tejeda A., Domínguez‑Oller J.C., Baldaquí‑Escandell J.M., Gómez‑Díaz R., García‑Rodríguez A., The impact of generative AI on academic reading and writing: a synthesis of recent evidence (2023–2025), „Frontiers in Education” 2026, t. 10, art. 1711718.

Schulhoff S. et al., The prompt report: A systematic survey of prompt engineering techniques, arXiv:2406.06608 (v6), 2024.

Searle J.R., Minds, brains, and programs, „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 1980, t. 3, nr 3.

Selbst D., Barocas S., The intuitive appeal of explainable machines, „Fordham Law Review” 2019, t. 87, nr 3.

Simonyan K., Zisserman A., Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.

Singh A., Wiktorsson M., Hauge J.B., Trends in machine learning to solve problems in logistics, „Procedia CIRP” 2021, t. 103.

Smith C.W., Mission Dependency Index of Air Force Built Infrastructure: Knowledge Discovery with Machine Learning, Air Force Institute of Technology, Ohio, 2016.

Song G., Fan Z., Lafferty J., Surfing: Iterative optimization over incrementally trained deep networks, „Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems” 2019, t. 32.

Sparks J., Koltay T., Hernández-Pérez T., Digital information literacy in higher education, „Journal of Academic Librarianship” 2016, t. 42, nr 2.

Stone P. et al., Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: The one hundred year study on artificial intelligence, arXiv:2211.06318, 2022.

Sutton R.S., Barto A.G., Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, wyd. 2, MIT Press, Cambridge 2018.

SWPS, Wybrane metody weryfikacji osiągania efektów uczenia się, 2023, https://swps.pl/images/DOKUMENTY/WSZJK/USWPS_Podrecznik_dydaktyczny_Wybrane_metody_weryfikacji_osiagania_efektow_uczenia_sie.pdf (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

Szepesvári C., Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning, Springer Nature, Switzerland 2022.

Taherdoost H., Designing a questionnaire for a research paper: A comprehensive guide to design and develop an effective questionnaire, „Asian Journal of Management Sciences” 2022, t. 11, nr 1.

Taherdoost H., Madanchian M., AI advancements: Comparison of innovative techniques, „AI” 2023, t. 5, nr 1.

Tan P.-N., Steinbach M., Karpatne A., Kumar V., Introduction to Data Mining, wyd. 2, Pearson, Harlow 2019.

Thesify, How professors detect AI in academic writing, 2025, https://www.thesify.ai/blog/how-professors-detect-ai-in-academic-writing-a-comprehensive-student-guide (dostęp: 7.05.2026).

Tomala L., W środę Dzień Nauki Polskiej: mamy ponad 81 tys. badaczy i 1,2 mln studentów, Nauka w Polsce, https://naukawpolsce.pl/aktualnosci/news%2C80765%2Cw-srode-dzien-nauki-polskiej-mamy-ponad-81-tys-badaczy-i-12-mln-studentow (dostęp: 1.01.2026).

Turing A.M., Computing machinery and intelligence, „Mind” 1950, t. 59, nr 236.

University of Reading, AI-generated exam answers: Detection and educational implications, Research Report, 2024, https://www.reading.ac.uk/news/024/Research-News/AI-generated-exam-answers-go-undetected-in-real-world-blind-test (dostęp: 3.12.2025).

van der Malsburg C., Frank Rosenblatt: Principles of neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms, [w:] Brain Theory: Proceedings of the First Trieste Meeting on Brain Theory, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg 1986.

Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L., Gomez A.N., Kaiser Ł., Polosukhin I., Attention is all you need, „Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems” 2017, t. 30.

Venkatasubramanian V., The promise of artificial intelligence in chemical engineering: Is it here, finally?, „AIChE Journal” 2019, t. 65, nr 2.

Wang H., Xu Y., Holmes K., Kaebnick G.E., Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, „Computers & Education” 2024, t. 204, art. 104871.

Wang Q., Zhan Z., Reinforcement learning model, algorithms and its application, [w:] 2011 International Conference on Mechatronic Science, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC), IEEE, 2011.

Wang Y., Chen J., Wu Y., Yu X., He L., Impact of generative artificial intelligence on scientific paper writing and regulatory pathways, „Educational Publishing (EP)” 2025, t. 3, nr 4.

Wei J. et al., Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models, arXiv:2201.11903, 2022.

Weidinger L. et al., Ethical and social risks of harm from language models, [w:] Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM, New York 2021.

Wetzel S.J., Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: From principal component analysis to variational autoencoders, „Physical Review E” 2017, t. 96, nr 2.

White J. et al., A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with LLMs, arXiv:2302.11382, 2023.

Wickramasinghe S., Amarasinghe K., Manic M., Deep self-organizing maps for unsupervised image classification, „IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics” 2019, t. 15, nr 11.

Windmann A., Machine Learning in Finance, praca magisterska, RWTH Aachen, 2020.

Winograd T., Extended inference modes in reasoning by computer systems, „Artificial Intelligence” 1980, t. 13, nr 1–2.

Wu X., Duan R., Ni J., Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT, „Journal of Information and Intelligence” 2024, t. 2, nr 2.

Xu B., Hallucination is inevitable for LLMs with the open world assumption, arXiv:2510.05116, 2025.

Yudkowsky E., Artificial general intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk, [w:] Global Catastrophic Risks, 2008.

Yusof J., ChatGPT-assisted retrieval practice and exam scores: Does it work?, „Journal of Information Technology Education: Research” 2025, t. 24, art. 8.

Zhang M., Li J., A commentary of GPT-3 in MIT Technology Review 2021, „Fundamental Research” 2021, t. 1, nr 6.

Pobrania

Dane do pobrania nie są jeszcze dostępne.

Licencja

Jak cytować

Popović, M., & Błaszczyk, M. (2026). Zastosowanie narzędzi AI w praktyce akademickiej: Wsparcie tworzenia i weryfikacja prac dyplomowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/8445-081-9